Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Danaher Life SciencesDanaher Life Sciences
VS
CSLCSL
Danaher Life Sciences

Danaher Life Sciences

500 Old Connecticut Path, Framingham, 01701, US

Last Update: 29/11/2025

View Profile
761/1000Fair

The Life Sciences companies of Danaher integrate the deep scientific expertise of our individual operating companies with the robust engineering know-how of the Danaher Business System to create innovative workflows that significantly bend the drug development time curv...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:66
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
CSL

CSL

655 Elizabeth St, Melbourne, 3000, AU

Last Update: 12/09/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.csl.com/
813/1000Good

CSL is a leading global biopharma company with a dynamic portfolio of lifesaving medicines, including those that treat haemophilia and immune deficiencies, vaccines to prevent influenza, and therapies in iron deficiency, dialysis and nephrology. Since our start in 1916,...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:23,312
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Danaher Life Sciences

Danaher Life Sciences

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
CSL

CSL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Danaher Life Sciences in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CSL in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Danaher Life Sciences (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Danaher Life Sciences cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CSL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CSL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Danaher Life Sciences

Danaher Life Sciences

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
CSL

CSL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences company and CSL company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences and CSL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences and CSL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Danaher Life Sciences or CSL ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Danaher Life Sciences or CSL ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences and CSL, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Danaher Life Sciences and CSL, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3