Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

DAMA International®DAMA International®
VS
Tata Consultancy ServicesTata Consultancy Services
DAMA International®

DAMA International®

2512 East Evergreen Blvd #1023, Vancouver, WA 98661-4323, US

Last Update: 04/03/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.dama.org
688/1000Weak

DAMA International: The Global Standard for Data Management DAMA International is the world's premier nonprofit organization advancing data management as a profession since 1980, serving thousands of professionals through 60+ global chapters. What DAMA International D...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:57
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Consultancy Services, Mumbai, 400001, IN

Last Update: 07/10/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.tcs.com/
712/1000Moderate

Tata Consultancy Services (TCS) is the technology partner of choice for industry leading organizations worldwide. Since its inception in 1968, TCS has upheld the highest standards of innovation, engineering excellence, and customer service. It has set an aspiration to...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:717,299
Subsidiaries:67
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
DAMA International®

DAMA International®

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Consultancy Services

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

DAMA International® has 32.43% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Tata Consultancy Services has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - DAMA International® (X = Date, Y = Severity)

DAMA International® cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tata Consultancy Services (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tata Consultancy Services cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
DAMA International®

DAMA International®

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DAM1772132386
Tata Consultancy Services

Tata Consultancy Services

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TAT1786447303
🔒 Incident : Breach
HCLTAT1786448292
🔒 Incident : Breach
TAT1786447105

FAQ

Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between DAMA International® company and Tata Consultancy Services company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between DAMA International® and Tata Consultancy Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between DAMA International® and Tata Consultancy Services, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - DAMA International® or Tata Consultancy Services ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - DAMA International® or Tata Consultancy Services ?
Between DAMA International® and Tata Consultancy Services, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between DAMA International® and Tata Consultancy Services, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-97032
SUMMARY

HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97031
SUMMARY

Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-97030
SUMMARY

A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-96207
SUMMARY

Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94510
SUMMARY

Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-08
UPDATED
Date2026-10-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:H/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
5.3
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9