Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dallas Police DepartmentDallas Police Department
VS
Swedish Police AuthoritySwedish Police Authority
Dallas Police Department

Dallas Police Department

undefined, undefined, undefined, undefined, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.dallaspolice.net
674/1000Weak

Dallas Police Department Mission Statement The Police Department, in serving the people of Dallas, strives to reduce crime and provide a safe city by; • Recognizing that its goal is to help people and provide assistance at every opportunity; • Providin...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:1,186
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
Swedish Police Authority

Swedish Police Authority

Polhemsgatan , Stockholm, 10226, SE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://polisen.se/
785/1000Fair

Vi gör hela Sverige tryggt och säkert! Att arbeta inom polisen är ett av de finaste uppdrag man kan ha. Du bidrar till samhället genom att göra hela Sverige tryggt och säkert. Oavsett om du jobbar i en civil roll eller som polis, är möjligheterna att växa med en större...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:10,579
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dallas Police Department

Dallas Police Department

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swedish Police Authority

Swedish Police Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dallas Police Department in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swedish Police Authority in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dallas Police Department (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dallas Police Department cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swedish Police Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swedish Police Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dallas Police Department

Dallas Police Department

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DAL17249523
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
DAL225627123
Swedish Police Authority

Swedish Police Authority

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dallas Police Department company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dallas Police Department and Swedish Police Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dallas Police Department and Swedish Police Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dallas Police Department or Swedish Police Authority ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dallas Police Department or Swedish Police Authority ?
Between Dallas Police Department and Swedish Police Authority, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dallas Police Department and Swedish Police Authority, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA