Comparison Overview
Dallas Mechanical Group, Inc.
Dallas Mechanical Group, Inc.
11925 N Stemmons Fwy, Dallas, Texas, 75234, US
Last Update: 01/12/2025
Dallas Mechanical Group (DMG) is a full-service provider of commercial HVAC construction, service, and maintenance solutions. With an experienced staff of more than 150, we are one of the largest, best-respected HVAC contractors in Texas. We're experienced in the instal...
Burns & McDonnell
9400 Ward Pkwy, Kansas City, 64114, US
Last Update: 21/09/2026
At Burns & McDonnell, our engineers, construction professionals, architects, planners, technologists and scientists do more than plan, design and construct. With a mission unchanged since 1898 — make our clients successful — we partner with you on the toughest challenge...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Dallas Mechanical Group, Inc.
Burns & McDonnell
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dallas Mechanical Group, Inc. in 2026.
Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Burns & McDonnell in 2026.
Incident History - Dallas Mechanical Group, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dallas Mechanical Group, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Burns & McDonnell (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Burns & McDonnell cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Dallas Mechanical Group, Inc.
Burns & McDonnell
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.