Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dalkia ENDalkia EN
VS
OranoOrano
Dalkia EN

Dalkia EN

Place des Corolles, Courbevoie, Île-de-France, 92400, FR

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile

Sur les centrales nucléaires du groupe EDF, nous intervenons sur tous les types de bâtiments, à la fois de production et tertiaires. Nous réalisons la maintenance des systèmes de ventilation et de production de froid, des groupes électrogènes de secours et des systèmes ...

NAICS:221113
NAICS Definition:Nuclear Electric Power Generation
Employees:451
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Orano

Orano

125, Avenue de Paris, Châtillon, 92320, FR

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.orano.group
781/1000Fair

Opérateur international reconnu dans le domaine des matières nucléaires, Orano apporte des solutions aux défis actuels et futurs, dans l’énergie et la santé. Son expertise ainsi que sa maîtrise des technologies de pointe permettent à Orano de proposer à ses clients des ...

NAICS:221113
NAICS Definition:Nuclear Electric Power Generation
Employees:12,279
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dalkia EN

Dalkia EN

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Orano

Orano

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Nuclear Electric Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dalkia EN in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Nuclear Electric Power Generation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Orano in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dalkia EN (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dalkia EN cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Orano (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Orano cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dalkia EN

Dalkia EN

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Orano

Orano

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dalkia EN company and Orano company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dalkia EN and Orano, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dalkia EN and Orano, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dalkia EN or Orano ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dalkia EN or Orano ?
Between Dalkia EN and Orano, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dalkia EN and Orano, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2