Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Daikin Czech Republic in PilsenDaikin Czech Republic in Pilsen
VS
Mitsubishi Heavy IndustriesMitsubishi Heavy Industries
Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen

Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen

U Nové Hospody 1/1155, Plzeň, 301 00, CZ

Last Update: 13/02/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.daikinczech.cz/
746/1000Moderate

The DAIKIN brand is one of the most prestigious manufacturers and developers of heat pumps and air conditioning units. Its origins date back to 1924 when the company was founded in the Japanese city of Osaka. Today, Daikin's factories are located across the globe. One ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:151
Subsidiaries:21
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

2−3 Marunouchi 3-Chome, Chiyoda-ku, Tokyo, JP, 100-8332

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.mhi.com
814/1000Good

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (MHI) Group is one of the world’s leading industrial firms. For more than 130 years, we have channeled big thinking into solutions that move the world forward – advancing the lives of everyone who shares our planet. We deliver innovative and ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:15,576
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen

Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Mitsubishi Heavy Industries in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Mitsubishi Heavy Industries (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen

Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Mitsubishi Heavy Industries

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen company and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen or Mitsubishi Heavy Industries ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen or Mitsubishi Heavy Industries ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Daikin Czech Republic in Pilsen and Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1