Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Daikin Airconditioning FranceDaikin Airconditioning France
VS
MetsoMetso
Daikin Airconditioning France

Daikin Airconditioning France

N/A

Last Update: 09/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.daikin.fr
749/1000Moderate

Daikin Airconditioning France commercialise des systèmes et des équipements de climatisation et de chauffage de très haute qualité pour application résidentielle, commerciale et industrielle. Filiale française du groupe japonais Daikin, Daikin Airconditioning France a é...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:614
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Metso

Metso

Rauhalanpuisto 9, P.O. Box 1000, Espoo, Uusimaa, FI, 02230

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.metso.com/
781/1000Fair

Metso is a frontrunner in sustainable technologies, end-to-end solutions and services for the aggregates, minerals processing and metals refining industries globally.  By improving our customers’ energy and water efficiency, increasing their productivity, and reducing ...

NAICS:3332
NAICS Definition:Industrial Machinery Manufacturing
Employees:20,240
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Daikin Airconditioning France

Daikin Airconditioning France

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Metso

Metso

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Daikin Airconditioning France in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Industrial Machinery Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Metso in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Daikin Airconditioning France (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Daikin Airconditioning France cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Metso (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Metso cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Daikin Airconditioning France

Daikin Airconditioning France

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Metso

Metso

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France company and Metso company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France and Metso, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France and Metso, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Daikin Airconditioning France or Metso ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Daikin Airconditioning France or Metso ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France and Metso, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Daikin Airconditioning France and Metso, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1