Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Dahua Technology Co. LTDDahua Technology Co. LTD
VS
VINCI EnergiesVINCI Energies
Dahua Technology Co. LTD

Dahua Technology Co. LTD

No.1399, Bin Xing Road, Binjiang District, Hangzhou, 310051, CN

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
776/1000Fair

Dahua Technology is a world-leading video-centric AIoT solution and service provider. With over 23,000 employees and strong R&D capabilities, Dahua delivers innovative technologies and high-quality solutions across 180+ countries and regions. Focused on driving digital ...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:5,136
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
VINCI Energies

VINCI Energies

2169, Boulevard de la Défense, Nanterre, 92000, FR

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
794/1000Fair

In a world undergoing constant change, VINCI Energies contributes to the environmental transition by helping bring about major trends in the digital landscape and energy sector. VINCI Energies’ teams roll out technologies and integrate customised multi-technical solutio...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:24,873
Subsidiaries:109
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Dahua Technology Co. LTD

Dahua Technology Co. LTD

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
VINCI Energies

VINCI Energies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

Dahua Technology Co. LTD has 45.95% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for VINCI Energies in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Dahua Technology Co. LTD (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dahua Technology Co. LTD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - VINCI Energies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

VINCI Energies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Dahua Technology Co. LTD

Dahua Technology Co. LTD

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
HIKDAH1772677469
VINCI Energies

VINCI Energies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD company and VINCI Energies company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD and VINCI Energies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD and VINCI Energies, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Dahua Technology Co. LTD or VINCI Energies ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Dahua Technology Co. LTD or VINCI Energies ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD and VINCI Energies, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Dahua Technology Co. LTD and VINCI Energies, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8