Comparison Overview

Dabur India Limited

VS

ITC Limited

Dabur India Limited

Kaushambi, Sahibabad, Ghaziabad, 201010, IN
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 750 and 799

We are Dabur, an Indian Transnational offering the best nature-based solutions to provide holistic Health & Well-Being to households in more than 120 markets spanning Asia, Europe and The US. A world leader in Ayurveda, we are a family of over 7,000 individuals continuously striving to conduct business in an environmentally sustainable manner. Home to trusted household brands like Dabur Chyawanprash, Dabur Honey, Dabur Red Paste, Dabur Amla, Vatika and Real, we are recognized the world over for our leadership, innovation and ability to reinvent ourselves and stay relevant for consumers across generations and geographies. At the heart of our success is our team of diverse, experienced and talented employees. They play a key role in seamlessly driving of our operations, developing and delivering nature-based solutions on time, every time, with their passion, excellence and innovative spirit. Be a part of one of the world’s Most Trusted brands... It’s an opportunity to learn, develop and enhance your skills, while improving the lives of consumers and communities.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 10,243
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ITC Limited

Virginia House, 37 J L Nehru Road, Kolkata, West Bengal, IN, 700071
Last Update: 2026-01-19
Between 800 and 849

ITC is one of India's foremost private sector companies with a Gross Revenue of ₹ 73,465 crores and EBITDA of ₹ 24,025 crores (as on 31.03.2025). ITC has a diversified presence in FMCG, Packaging, Paperboards & Specialty Papers and Agri-Business. ITC's aspiration to be an exemplar in sustainability practices is manifest in its status as the only company in the world, of its size and diversity, to be carbon, water and solid waste recycling positive. In addition, ITC's businesses and value chains create sustainable livelihoods for nearly 9 million people, a majority of whom represent the poorest in rural India.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 59,071
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dabur-india-limited.jpeg
Dabur India Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itc-limited.jpeg
ITC Limited
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Dabur India Limited
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ITC Limited
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Dabur India Limited in 2026.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITC Limited in 2026.

Incident History — Dabur India Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Dabur India Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — ITC Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITC Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/dabur-india-limited.jpeg
Dabur India Limited
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/itc-limited.jpeg
ITC Limited
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

ITC Limited company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Dabur India Limited company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, ITC Limited company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Dabur India Limited company.

In the current year, ITC Limited company and Dabur India Limited company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ITC Limited company nor Dabur India Limited company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ITC Limited company nor Dabur India Limited company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ITC Limited company nor Dabur India Limited company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Dabur India Limited company nor ITC Limited company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Dabur India Limited nor ITC Limited holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

ITC Limited company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Dabur India Limited company.

ITC Limited company employs more people globally than Dabur India Limited company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Dabur India Limited nor ITC Limited holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Dabur India Limited nor ITC Limited holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Dabur India Limited nor ITC Limited holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Dabur India Limited nor ITC Limited holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Dabur India Limited nor ITC Limited holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Dabur India Limited nor ITC Limited holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/backend-defaults provides the default implementations and setup for a standard Backstage backend app. Prior to versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0, the `FetchUrlReader` component, used by the catalog and other plugins to fetch content from URLs, followed HTTP redirects automatically. This allowed an attacker who controls a host listed in `backend.reading.allow` to redirect requests to internal or sensitive URLs that are not on the allowlist, bypassing the URL allowlist security control. This is a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow access to internal resources, but it does not allow attackers to include additional request headers. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` version 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Restrict `backend.reading.allow` to only trusted hosts that you control and that do not issue redirects, ensure allowed hosts do not have open redirect vulnerabilities, and/or use network-level controls to block access from Backstage to sensitive internal endpoints.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals, and @backstage/cli-common provides config loading functionality used by the backend and command line interface of Backstage. Prior to version 0.1.17, the `resolveSafeChildPath` utility function in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api`, which is used to prevent path traversal attacks, failed to properly validate symlink chains and dangling symlinks. An attacker could bypass the path validation via symlink chains (creating `link1 → link2 → /outside` where intermediate symlinks eventually resolve outside the allowed directory) and dangling symlinks (creating symlinks pointing to non-existent paths outside the base directory, which would later be created during file operations). This function is used by Scaffolder actions and other backend components to ensure file operations stay within designated directories. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-plugin-api` version 0.1.17. Users should upgrade to this version or later. Some workarounds are available. Run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access and/or restrict template creation to trusted users.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
Description

Backstage is an open framework for building developer portals. Multiple Scaffolder actions and archive extraction utilities were vulnerable to symlink-based path traversal attacks. An attacker with access to create and execute Scaffolder templates could exploit symlinks to read arbitrary files via the `debug:log` action by creating a symlink pointing to sensitive files (e.g., `/etc/passwd`, configuration files, secrets); delete arbitrary files via the `fs:delete` action by creating symlinks pointing outside the workspace, and write files outside the workspace via archive extraction (tar/zip) containing malicious symlinks. This affects any Backstage deployment where users can create or execute Scaffolder templates. This vulnerability is fixed in `@backstage/backend-defaults` versions 0.12.2, 0.13.2, 0.14.1, and 0.15.0; `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-backend` versions 2.2.2, 3.0.2, and 3.1.1; and `@backstage/plugin-scaffolder-node` versions 0.11.2 and 0.12.3. Users should upgrade to these versions or later. Some workarounds are available. Follow the recommendation in the Backstage Threat Model to limit access to creating and updating templates, restrict who can create and execute Scaffolder templates using the permissions framework, audit existing templates for symlink usage, and/or run Backstage in a containerized environment with limited filesystem access.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
Description

FastAPI Api Key provides a backend-agnostic library that provides an API key system. Version 1.1.0 has a timing side-channel vulnerability in verify_key(). The method applied a random delay only on verification failures, allowing an attacker to statistically distinguish valid from invalid API keys by measuring response latencies. With enough repeated requests, an adversary could infer whether a key_id corresponds to a valid key, potentially accelerating brute-force or enumeration attacks. All users relying on verify_key() for API key authentication prior to the fix are affected. Users should upgrade to version 1.1.0 to receive a patch. The patch applies a uniform random delay (min_delay to max_delay) to all responses regardless of outcome, eliminating the timing correlation. Some workarounds are available. Add an application-level fixed delay or random jitter to all authentication responses (success and failure) before the fix is applied and/or use rate limiting to reduce the feasibility of statistical timing attacks.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

The Flux Operator is a Kubernetes CRD controller that manages the lifecycle of CNCF Flux CD and the ControlPlane enterprise distribution. Starting in version 0.36.0 and prior to version 0.40.0, a privilege escalation vulnerability exists in the Flux Operator Web UI authentication code that allows an attacker to bypass Kubernetes RBAC impersonation and execute API requests with the operator's service account privileges. In order to be vulnerable, cluster admins must configure the Flux Operator with an OIDC provider that issues tokens lacking the expected claims (e.g., `email`, `groups`), or configure custom CEL expressions that can evaluate to empty values. After OIDC token claims are processed through CEL expressions, there is no validation that the resulting `username` and `groups` values are non-empty. When both values are empty, the Kubernetes client-go library does not add impersonation headers to API requests, causing them to be executed with the flux-operator service account's credentials instead of the authenticated user's limited permissions. This can result in privilege escalation, data exposure, and/or information disclosure. Version 0.40.0 patches the issue.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N