Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

D-Fend SolutionsD-Fend Solutions
VS
General AtomicsGeneral Atomics
D-Fend Solutions

D-Fend Solutions

Ra'anana, 4366241, IL

Last Update: 21/03/2026

View Profile
747/1000Moderate

D-Fend Solutions is the leading counter-drone, RF cyber-takeover technology provider, enabling control, safety and continuity during rogue drone incidents to overcome both current and emerging drone threats in complex and sensitive environments. With hundreds of deploym...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:211
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
General Atomics

General Atomics

3550 General Atomics Ct, San Diego, 92121, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://ga.com
769/1000Fair

The freedom to explore. The promise to deliver. General Atomics, based in San Diego, CA, develops advanced technology solutions for government and commercial applications. Privately owned and vertically integrated, we have the freedom to invest in the most innovative ...

NAICS:336414
NAICS Definition:Guided Missile and Space Vehicle Manufacturing
Employees:10,832
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
D-Fend Solutions

D-Fend Solutions

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
General Atomics

General Atomics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for D-Fend Solutions in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Defense and Space Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for General Atomics in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - D-Fend Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

D-Fend Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - General Atomics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

General Atomics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
D-Fend Solutions

D-Fend Solutions

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
General Atomics

General Atomics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between D-Fend Solutions company and General Atomics company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between D-Fend Solutions and General Atomics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between D-Fend Solutions and General Atomics, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - D-Fend Solutions or General Atomics ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - D-Fend Solutions or General Atomics ?
Between D-Fend Solutions and General Atomics, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between D-Fend Solutions and General Atomics, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA