Comparison Overview
D.A. Davidson Companies

D.A. Davidson Companies
8 3rd St N, Great Falls, 59401, US
Last Update: 31/03/2026
At D.A. Davidson Companies, we identify and evaluate market trends, investment ideas and business opportunities, and turn them into actionable insights and strategies. Founded in 1935 as a small brokerage firm, D.A. Davidson has grown into a diversified financial servic...

Lloyds Banking Group
25 Gresham Street, London, EC2V 7HN, GB
Last Update: 15/09/2026
Our purpose is Helping Britain Prosper. We do this by creating a more sustainable and inclusive future for people and businesses, shaping finance as a force for good. We're part of an ever-changing industry and are currently on a journey to shape the financial services...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

D.A. Davidson Companies







Lloyds Banking Group






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for D.A. Davidson Companies in 2026.
Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)
Lloyds Banking Group has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - D.A. Davidson Companies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
D.A. Davidson Companies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Lloyds Banking Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Lloyds Banking Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

D.A. Davidson Companies

Lloyds Banking Group
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was detected in erzhongxmu JEEWMS up to 2026.09.27-W39. Impacted is the function docheck of the file src/main/java/com/zzjee/wm/controller/WmOmNoticeHController.java. Performing a manipulation of the argument goodscode results in sql injection. The attack may be initiated remotely. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A security vulnerability has been detected in bleenco abstruse up to 2.1.0. This issue affects the function filepath.Join of the file server/api/worker/download_cache.go of the component Cache Endpoint. Such manipulation of the argument File leads to path traversal. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
A weakness has been identified in Appwrite up to 2.3.0. This vulnerability affects the function PublicHostname of the file src/Appwrite/Platform/Modules/Avatars/Http/Screenshots/Get.php of the component Browser Screenshot Service. This manipulation of the argument url causes server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. Upgrading to version 2.4.0 is able to resolve this issue. Patch name: 393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe. You should upgrade the affected component.
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/commit/393255e7302ae5503331d45802e2eee01c6a47fe
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/pull/13995
- https://github.com/appwrite/appwrite/releases/tag/2.4.0
- https://github.com/godzeo/vulhub/issues/2
- https://vuldb.com/cve/CVE-2026-108770
- https://vuldb.com/submit/958017
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/416552
- https://vuldb.com/vuln/416552/cti
Heap-based buffer overflow vulnerability in Samsung Opensource rlottie allows Buffer Overflow via Environment Variables. This issue affects rlottie: e57b094f03c39a751a1fded6f7d6c13f1ed95ec9.
A security flaw has been discovered in zhayujie CowAgent up to 2.2.0. This affects an unknown part of the file Markdown.tsx of the component Markdown Rendering. The manipulation results in denial of service. It is possible to launch the attack remotely. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.