What is the official website of D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers ?

The official website of D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers is https://www.dplawct.com.

What is D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers's cybersecurity risk score?

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers has an AI-generated cybersecurity risk score of 661 out of 1000, indicating a Weak security posture according to Rankiteo's assessment.

How many security incidents has D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers experienced?

According to Rankiteo, D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Has D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents ?

According to Rankiteo, D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers has not been affected by any supply chain cyber incidents, and no incident IDs are currently listed for the organization.

Does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Which industry does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers operate in ?

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers operates primarily in the Law Practice industry.

How many employees does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers have ?

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers employs approximately 11 people worldwide.

Does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers own any subsidiaries ?

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

How many LinkedIn followers does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers have ?

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers's official LinkedIn profile has approximately 158 followers.

What is the NAICS classification code for D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers ?

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers is classified under the NAICS code 54111, which corresponds to Offices of Lawyers.

Does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers have a Crunchbase profile ?

No, D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers does not have a profile on Crunchbase.

Does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers have a LinkedIn profile ?

Yes, D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/d'amico-&-pettinicchi.

How many cybersecurity incidents has D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers experienced ?

As of July 2, 2026, Rankiteo reports that D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.

How many peer or competitor companies does D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers have ?

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers has an estimated 16,150 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents has D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers faced ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.

NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop

WindowsmacOSLinux

Download

Badge your company to reduce your risk score and your cyber insurance costs!

Link verified badges to your company page to build trust with insurers and customers.

Apply now and get your badge!

Internal validation & live display

Insurers and partners see a safer profile

Faster underwriting decisions

Trusted by insurers. Chosen by leaders.

Proud contributor to the Society of Actuaries.

DPIL

Boost Score +25 with badge (5 left)

661

/1000

Weak

686

/1000

Weak

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers Vendor Cyber Rating & Cyber Score

damicopettinicchi.com

Add Your Compliance Badge

At D’Amico & Pettinicchi, LLC we fight for the injured – and we don’t back down. For 35 years, we’ve represented people across Connecticut whose lives were changed by negligence: a serious car crash, a fatal medical error, a loved one harmed in a nursing home. Our goal is to help people rebuild their lives, get the care they need, and receive full compensation for what they’ve lost. We stand with individuals and families – and we fight the good fight. Founded in 1990 by Mike D’Amico and Tom Pettinicchi, we built our firm on a simple principle: every client deserves a lawyer who will go all in. That still drives us today. With Jeremy D’Amico, Christine Norton, and a dedicated team of paralegals and trial professionals, we deliver fierce,

DPIL A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

Scoring History

DPIL

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents

Attack Types

Entity

Type

Severity

Impact

Seen

Blog Details

Supply Chain Source

Incident Details

View

D'Amico Pettinicchi...

Breach

4/2024

D'A133072725

D'Amico Pettinicchi...

Breach

3/2024

D'A041091825

Loading…

A.I.

DPIL Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction

Incident Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

Actual

Prediction A

Prediction B

Prediction C

Prediction D

A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked

Access Monitoring Plan

Loading…

Underwriter Stats for DPIL

Incidents vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers in 2026.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers in 2026.

Incident Types DPIL vs Law Practice Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers in 2026.

Incident History - DPIL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Loading…

SUBSIDIARY

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers Subsidiaries

Parent Company

DPIL

Law Practice

Website: https://www.dplawct.com

Company Size: 11

No subsidiary data available for this company.

Loading…

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers Similar Companies

DLA Piper

dlapiper.com

DLA Piper is a global law firm helping our clients achieve their goals wherever they do business. Our pursuit of innovation has transformed our delivery of legal services. With offices in the Americas, Europe, the Middle East, Africa and Asia Pacific, we deliver exceptional outcomes on cross-border projects, critical transactions and high-stakes disputes. Every day we help trailblazing organizations seize business opportunities and successfully manage growth and change at speed. Through our pro bono work and community investment around the world, we help create a more just and sustainable future. Visit dlapiper.com to discover more.

Loading…

NEWS

D'Amico Pettinicchi | Injury Lawyers CyberSecurity News

Latest updates, reports, and threat intel affecting the global network.

July 24, 2025 07:00 AM

$45M Waterbury Verdict: Jury Finds for Paraplegic After Motorcycle Crash

D'Amico & Pettinicchi secured a $45 million verdict on Tuesday for a man paralyzed from the belly button down after a motorcycle accident.

Read Article

Loading…

CVE

Latest

Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

CVE-2026-55790

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.22 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.15, an attacker with only a GitHub account can plant a JavaScript payload in a craftcms/cms issue title. When a Craft admin uses the CraftSupport widget’s "Give feedback" screen and types a search term that returns the poisoned issue, the payload executes in the admin’s control panel session. No control panel account or elevated privileges are required on the attacker’s side. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.16 and 5.9.23.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.4

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50284

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). In versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.21 and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.14, theAssetsController::actionDeleteFolder() only requires the deleteAssets:<volume-uid> permission for the target folder. It never enforces deletePeerAssets:<volume-uid>, even though Assets::deleteFoldersByIds() cascades deletion to every descendant folder and every asset inside, regardless of the uploader's assigned privileges. A low-privilege user who has been granted folder-management rights on a shared volume can therefore destroy assets uploaded by other users (peer assets), bypassing the per-asset peer-permission check that the sibling actionDeleteAsset endpoint correctly applies. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.15 and 5.9.22.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.1

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-50283

SUMMARY

Craft CMS is a content management system (CMS). Versions 5.0.0-RC1 through 5.9.20, and 4.0.0-RC1 through 4.17.13 contain an authorization issue in the AssetsController::actionReplaceFile that can delete a source asset without source delete permission by supplying both assetId and sourceAssetId. AssetsController::actionReplaceFile() supports replacing a target asset file using another existing asset as the source. The action loads: assetId -> $assetToReplace and sourceAssetId -> $sourceAsset, then enforces replace permissions using ($assetToReplace ?: $sourceAsset). When both IDs are provided, this expression resolves to the target asset so no permission check is performed against the source asset volume. When both assets are present, Craft copies the source file into the target and then deletes the source asset. There is no deletion check for for the source asset. An authenticated user who can replace files in one volume can delete assets in another volume where they do not have delete permission, as long as they can obtain a sourceAssetId, leading to broken content references and data loss. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.17.14 and 5.9.21.

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 5.3

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14440

SUMMARY

Description: To issue and renew TLS certificates on behalf of customers, Cloudflare's Universal SSL feature automatically manages the CAA RRset for the customer's zone. This auto-managed RRset is permissive by design (e.g. 'issue "letsencrypt.org"' without parameters). On Universal SSL zones, Cloudflare's authoritative DNS serves this auto-managed RRset at query time, superseding any customer-configured CAA records on the zone. When a customer publishes a stricter CAA record using the RFC 8657 accounturi or validationmethods parameters, the Certificate Authority does not observe those parameters when evaluating the served RRset under RFC 8659. As a result, the RFC 8657 account-binding and validation-method-binding protections are not enforced end-to-end on Universal SSL zones. Successful exploitation could result in issuance of a browser-trusted TLS certificate to an attacker, enabling MITM against the affected domain. Exploitation is non-trivial in practice: an attacker would need to hold an ACME account at one of the Certificate Authorities in the served CAA RRset and to simultaneously satisfy domain control validation across the multiple geographically distinct Network Perspectives the CA relies on for Multi-Perspective Issuance Corroboration. Cloudflare prefixes are anycast-announced from hundreds of locations globally, raising the bar against single-vantage-point BGP hijacks. Any resulting misissuance of a browser-trusted certificate is subject to Certificate Transparency logging required by major browsers, and would be visible to CT monitoring. Mitigation: Customers requiring strict RFC 8657 enforcement need to disable Universal SSL on the affected zone. Universal SSL's automatic CAA management and customer-set RFC 8657 accounturi and validationmethods enforcement are mutually exclusive by the nature of the issue, so there is no in-product workaround that preserves both. Certificate Transparency monitoring is recommended for all customers as a general detection control. Credits: David Osipov (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0005-2713-9242), independent researcher

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

cvss4

Base Score: 7.6

Complexity: HIGH

CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:H/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-14422

SUMMARY

Out of bounds read and write in Tint in Google Chrome prior to 150.0.7871.46 allowed a remote attacker to potentially perform out of bounds memory access via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

Published

Date2026-07-01

Updated

Date2026-07-01

RISK INFORMATION (Score: )

Impact Score

Exploitability

REFERENCES

Loading…

API

Access Data Using Our API

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?
linkedin_id=axa' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

Try It API Documentation Rapid

MEASURE

What Do We Measure ?

Incident

Finding

Grade

Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network SecurityIdentify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat IntelligenceLeverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Rankiteo

By Rankiteo

★ ★ ★ ★ ★

View on G2.com

Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.

View latest plans →View all security reports →

MILESTONEG

Users
Love Us

Loading…