Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cybersecurity @ KCL InformaticsCybersecurity @ KCL Informatics
VS
University of Buenos AiresUniversity of Buenos Aires
Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

N/A

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
787/1000Fair

LinkedIn page of the Cybersecurity group at KCL Informatics. This page is managed by Dr. Fabio Pierazzi.

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of Buenos Aires

University of Buenos Aires

Viamonte 430 Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, Ciudad Autónoma de Buenos Aires, AR, C1114AAD

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.uba.ar/
817/1000Good

La Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA) es la universidad pública más importante de Argentina. Es reconocida por los principales rankings internacionales como la mejor universidad de Iberoamérica. Actualmente, ocupa el puesto Nº 67 en el Ranking QS global. Su modelo de gr...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:25,525
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of Buenos Aires

University of Buenos Aires

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Buenos Aires in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of Buenos Aires (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Buenos Aires cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of Buenos Aires

University of Buenos Aires

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and University of Buenos Aires company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics and University of Buenos Aires, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics and University of Buenos Aires, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics or University of Buenos Aires ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics or University of Buenos Aires ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics and University of Buenos Aires, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics and University of Buenos Aires, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2