Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cybersecurity @ KCL InformaticsCybersecurity @ KCL Informatics
VS
Auburn UniversityAuburn University
Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

N/A

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.kcl.ac.uk/research/cys
787/1000Fair

LinkedIn page of the Cybersecurity group at KCL Informatics. This page is managed by Dr. Fabio Pierazzi.

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Auburn University

Auburn University

23 Samford Hall, Auburn, AL, US, 36849

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.auburn.edu
792/1000Fair

Auburn University is a comprehensive land, space and sea grant research institution blending arts and applied sciences. The university continuously changes to accommodate today's needs, while still respecting the traditions and spirit of Auburn. As we grow and change, A...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:11,541
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Auburn University

Auburn University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Auburn University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Auburn University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Auburn University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Auburn University

Auburn University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
AUB17592123

FAQ

Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics company and Auburn University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics and Auburn University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics and Auburn University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics or Auburn University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics or Auburn University ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics and Auburn University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cybersecurity @ KCL Informatics and Auburn University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-93892
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-93891
SUMMARY

IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-92832
SUMMARY

IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-85457
SUMMARY

IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-84418
SUMMARY

IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-12
UPDATED
Date2026-10-12
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
REFERENCES