Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cypress Title CorporationCypress Title Corporation
VS
REMAXREMAX
Cypress Title Corporation

Cypress Title Corporation

1156 Scenic Dr, Modesto, 95350, US

Last Update: 03/12/2025

View Profile
754/1000Fair

We work hard to keep closings as simple as possible and on time. Our team consists of licensed title agents, processors and customer service representatives who are committed to a smooth closing experience for all parties involved. Our team is well versed on the intrica...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
REMAX

REMAX

5075 S. Syracuse St., Denver, 80237, US

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.remax.com
743/1000Moderate

As one of the leading global real estate franchisors, RE/MAX, LLC is a subsidiary of RE/MAX Holdings (NYSE: RMAX) with more than 140,000 agents in almost 9,000 offices and a presence in more than 110 countries and territories. Nobody in the world sells more real estat...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:43,488
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cypress Title Corporation

Cypress Title Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
REMAX

REMAX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cypress Title Corporation in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for REMAX in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cypress Title Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cypress Title Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - REMAX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

REMAX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cypress Title Corporation

Cypress Title Corporation

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
REMAX

REMAX

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
JOHREM1770865850

FAQ

Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation company and REMAX company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation and REMAX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation and REMAX, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cypress Title Corporation or REMAX ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cypress Title Corporation or REMAX ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation and REMAX, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cypress Title Corporation and REMAX, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3