Comparison Overview

CyberSec Solutions

VS

Computacenter

CyberSec Solutions

None
Last Update: 2025-12-20
Between 700 and 749

None

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Computacenter

Hatfield Avenue, Hatfield, Hertfordshire, GB, AL10 9TW
Last Update: 2025-12-17
Between 750 and 799

Computacenter is a leading independent technology and services provider, trusted by large corporate and public sector organisations. We are a responsible business that believes in winning together for our people and our planet. We help our customers to Source, Transform and Manage their technology infrastructure to deliver digital transformation, enabling people and their business. Computacenter plc is a public company quoted on the London Stock Exchange (CCC.L) and a member of the FTSE 250. Computacenter employs over 20,000 people worldwide.

NAICS: None
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 16,491
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybersec-solutions.jpeg
CyberSec Solutions
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computacenter.jpeg
Computacenter
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CyberSec Solutions
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Computacenter
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CyberSec Solutions in 2025.

Incidents vs Information Technology & Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Computacenter in 2025.

Incident History — CyberSec Solutions (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CyberSec Solutions cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Computacenter (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Computacenter cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybersec-solutions.jpeg
CyberSec Solutions
Incidents

Date Detected: 3/2023
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unauthorized Access
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/computacenter.jpeg
Computacenter
Incidents

Date Detected: 05/2019
Type:Data Leak
Attack Vector: Mailbox Compromise
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Computacenter company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to CyberSec Solutions company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

CyberSec Solutions and Computacenter have experienced a similar number of publicly disclosed cyber incidents.

In the current year, Computacenter company and CyberSec Solutions company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Computacenter company nor CyberSec Solutions company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

CyberSec Solutions company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Computacenter company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Computacenter company nor CyberSec Solutions company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CyberSec Solutions company nor Computacenter company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CyberSec Solutions nor Computacenter holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CyberSec Solutions company nor Computacenter company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Computacenter company employs more people globally than CyberSec Solutions company, reflecting its scale as a Information Technology & Services.

Neither CyberSec Solutions nor Computacenter holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CyberSec Solutions nor Computacenter holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CyberSec Solutions nor Computacenter holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CyberSec Solutions nor Computacenter holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CyberSec Solutions nor Computacenter holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CyberSec Solutions nor Computacenter holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Versa SASE Client for Windows versions released between 7.8.7 and 7.9.4 contain a local privilege escalation vulnerability in the audit log export functionality. The client communicates user-controlled file paths to a privileged service, which performs file system operations without impersonating the requesting user. Due to improper privilege handling and a time-of-check time-of-use race condition combined with symbolic link and mount point manipulation, a local authenticated attacker can coerce the service into deleting arbitrary directories with SYSTEM privileges. This can be exploited to delete protected system folders such as C:\\Config.msi and subsequently achieve execution as NT AUTHORITY\\SYSTEM via MSI rollback techniques.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to unauthorized modification of data due to a missing capability check on the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' function in all versions up to, and including, 7.7. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to inject cross-site scripting into the 'status' parameter of applied jobs for any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.6
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:L
Description

The WP JobHunt plugin for WordPress, used by the JobCareer theme, is vulnerable to Insecure Direct Object Reference in all versions up to, and including, 7.7 via the 'cs_update_application_status_callback' due to missing validation on a user controlled key. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Candidate-level access and above, to send a site-generated email with injected HTML to any user.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
Description

The FiboSearch – Ajax Search for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the plugin's `thegem_te_search` shortcode in all versions up to, and including, 1.32.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping on user supplied attributes. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. This vulnerability requires TheGem theme (premium) to be installed with Header Builder mode enabled, and the FiboSearch "Replace search bars" option enabled for TheGem integration.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

The Ultimate Member – User Profile, Registration, Login, Member Directory, Content Restriction & Membership Plugin plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Sensitive Information Exposure in all versions up to, and including, 2.11.0 via the ajax_get_members function. This is due to the use of a predictable low-entropy token (5 hex characters derived from md5 of post ID) to identify member directories and insufficient authorization checks on the unauthenticated AJAX endpoint. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract sensitive data including usernames, display names, user roles (including administrator accounts), profile URLs, and user IDs by enumerating predictable directory_id values or brute-forcing the small 16^5 token space.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N