Comparison Overview
Cyber Security Services from Fresh Mango Technologies

Cyber Security Services from Fresh Mango Technologies
6 Brewery Close, Barker Business Park, Ripon, HG4 5NL, GB
Last Update: 05/12/2025
We continue to innovate and meet market demands, which is why our Complete Cyber Security service has been developed to maximize the security of our client’s IT systems. We prevent and resolve cyber issues for clients throughout the UK and beyond. We have a range of Cyb...

SoftwareOne
Riedenmatt 4, Stans, CH, 6370
Last Update: 11/09/2026
SoftwareOne is a global software and cloud solutions provider. With a presence in over 70 countries and a team of around 13,000 professionals, we combine global scale and local expertise to help clients optimize costs, accelerate growth, and navigate complex IT environm...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cyber Security Services from Fresh Mango Technologies







SoftwareOne






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cyber Security Services from Fresh Mango Technologies in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for SoftwareOne in 2026.
Incident History - Cyber Security Services from Fresh Mango Technologies (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cyber Security Services from Fresh Mango Technologies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - SoftwareOne (X = Date, Y = Severity)
SoftwareOne cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cyber Security Services from Fresh Mango Technologies

SoftwareOne
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.