Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

C&W Services SingaporeC&W Services Singapore
VS
Grupo GPSGrupo GPS
C&W Services Singapore

C&W Services Singapore

750A Chai Chee Road, Singapore, 469001, SG

Last Update: 30/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cwservices.sg
760/1000Fair

C&W Services Singapore is a fully integrated facility services, engineering solutions and energy management company. C&W Services has over 30 years’ experience delivering facilities and property management services in Singapore. We provide services to developers, proper...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:404
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Grupo GPS

Grupo GPS

Avenida Miguel Frias e Vasconcelos, 1205 - Jaguaré, São Paulo, 05345000, BR

Last Update: 14/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.gpssa.com.br
794/1000Fair

Fundado em 1962, em Salvador, o Grupo GPS é um grupo empresarial composto por empresas atuantes no mercado brasileiro de serviços indoor: GPS – Gerenciamento de segurança patrimonial Predial – Soluções em infra serviços In-Haus – Logística flexível traduzida em resulta...

NAICS:5612
NAICS Definition:Facilities Support Services
Employees:23,097
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
C&W Services Singapore

C&W Services Singapore

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Grupo GPS

Grupo GPS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for C&W Services Singapore in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Facilities Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Grupo GPS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - C&W Services Singapore (X = Date, Y = Severity)

C&W Services Singapore cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Grupo GPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Grupo GPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
C&W Services Singapore

C&W Services Singapore

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Grupo GPS

Grupo GPS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between C&W Services Singapore company and Grupo GPS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between C&W Services Singapore and Grupo GPS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between C&W Services Singapore and Grupo GPS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - C&W Services Singapore or Grupo GPS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - C&W Services Singapore or Grupo GPS ?
Between C&W Services Singapore and Grupo GPS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between C&W Services Singapore and Grupo GPS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9