Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CVS HealthspireCVS Healthspire
VS
UCHealthUCHealth
CVS Healthspire

CVS Healthspire

N/A

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cvshealth.com
761/1000Fair

CVS Healthspire™ brings together actionable insights and smart engagement strategies that complement your business goals and create enduring value. Our clinical experts design, develop and deliver targeted solutions using our people-centricity and trusted local presence...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
UCHealth

UCHealth

12401 E. 17th Avenue, Aurora, 80045, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.uchealth.org
758/1000Fair

At UCHealth, we do things differently. We strive to promote individual and community health and leave no question unanswered along the way. We’re driven to improve and optimize health care. Our network of nationally-recognized hospitals, clinic locations and health car...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:22,782
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CVS Healthspire

CVS Healthspire

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UCHealth

UCHealth

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CVS Healthspire in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UCHealth in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CVS Healthspire (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CVS Healthspire cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UCHealth (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UCHealth cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CVS Healthspire

CVS Healthspire

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
UCHealth

UCHealth

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UCH9289223

FAQ

Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CVS Healthspire company and UCHealth company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CVS Healthspire and UCHealth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CVS Healthspire and UCHealth, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CVS Healthspire or UCHealth ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CVS Healthspire or UCHealth ?
Between CVS Healthspire and UCHealth, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CVS Healthspire and UCHealth, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA