Comparison Overview
CVM

CVM
5 Westbrook Corporate Center, Westchester, IL, 60154, US
Last Update: 20/02/2026
CVM, a supplier.io company, is the premier provider of global supplier data and supplier diversity solutions. CVM delivers data, services, and technology needed to manage supplier diversity initiatives. CVM has partnered with more than half of the Fortune 100 and half o...

Samsung SDS
Samsung SDS 125, Olympic-ro 35-gil, Songpa-gu, Seoul, 05510, KR
Last Update: 29/03/2026
Samsung SDS provides cloud computing and digital logistics services. We build an optimized cloud environment with Samsung Cloud Platform specialized for businesses, provide all-in-one management service based on 38 years of expertise in each industry, and boost work eff...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CVM







Samsung SDS






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CVM in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Samsung SDS in 2026.
Incident History - CVM (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CVM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Samsung SDS (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Samsung SDS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CVM

Samsung SDS
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.