Cushmanwakefieldechinox vs Costar-group - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating

Comparison Overview

Cushman & Wakefield Echinox

VS

CoStar Group

Cushman & Wakefield Echinox

Strada Buzești 82, Bucharest, undefined, 011017, RO

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://cwechinox.com/

754/1000Fair

Cushman & Wakefield Echinox is the exclusive affiliate of Cushman & Wakefield in Romania, owned and operated independently, with a team of over 80 professionals & collaborators that provide a full range of services to investors, occupiers and owners across all sectors o...

NAICS:N/A

NAICS Definition:N/A

Employees:78

Subsidiaries:9

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

0

CoStar Group

1201 Wilson Blvd, Arlington, Virginia, US, 22209

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile

Between 750 and 799

http://www.costargroup.com

788/1000Fair

CoStar Group (NASDAQ: CSGP) is a global leader in commercial real estate information, analytics, online marketplaces, and 3D digital twin technology. Founded in 1986, CoStar Group is dedicated to digitizing the world’s real estate, empowering all people to discover prop...

NAICS:N/A

NAICS Definition:Others

Employees:11,942

Subsidiaries:0

12-month incidents

0

Known data breaches

0

Attack type number

0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category

Cushman & Wakefield Echinox

-

ISO 27001Not verified

-

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

-

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

-

GDPRNot verified

-

PCI DSSNot verified

-

HIPAANot verified

CoStar Group

-

ISO 27001Not verified

-

SOC2 Type 1Not verified

-

SOC2 Type 2Not verified

-

GDPRNot verified

-

PCI DSSNot verified

-

HIPAANot verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cushman & Wakefield Echinox in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CoStar Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cushman & Wakefield Echinox (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cushman & Wakefield Echinox cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Incident History - CoStar Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CoStar Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available

R - Ransomware

C - Cyber Attack

D - Data Breach

V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...

Cushman & Wakefield Echinox

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

CoStar Group

Incidents

No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox company and CoStar Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox and CoStar Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox and CoStar Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?

Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cushman & Wakefield Echinox or CoStar Group ?

Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cushman & Wakefield Echinox or CoStar Group ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox and CoStar Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?

Between Cushman & Wakefield Echinox and CoStar Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-103047

SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - CentralAuth extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mediawiki - CentralAuth extension: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-29

UPDATED

Date2026-09-29

IMPACT SCORE

NA

EXPLOITABILITY

NA

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-103046

SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in Wikimedia Foundation MediaWiki - WikiLambda extension allows Stored XSS. This issue affects MediaWiki - WikiLambda extension: before 1.46.1.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-29

UPDATED

Date2026-09-29

IMPACT SCORE

NA

EXPLOITABILITY

NA

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-103045

SUMMARY

Improper neutralization of input during web page generation ('cross-site scripting') vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - Refreshed skin allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Mediawiki - Refreshed skin: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-29

UPDATED

Date2026-09-29

IMPACT SCORE

NA

EXPLOITABILITY

NA

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-103044

SUMMARY

XML injection (aka blind XPath injection) vulnerability in The Wikimedia Foundation Mediawiki - EasyTimeline extension allows XML Injection. This issue affects Mediawiki - EasyTimeline extension: before 1.46.1, 1.45.5, 1.43.10.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-29

UPDATED

Date2026-09-29

IMPACT SCORE

NA

EXPLOITABILITY

NA

REFERENCES

CVE-2026-103043

SUMMARY

anchorme through 3.0.8 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in the IPv6 host extraction regex due to catastrophic backtracking. Attackers can supply specially crafted input strings with repeated patterns to cause exponential regex engine backtracking, blocking the Node.js event loop and denying service to other requests.

PUBLISHED

Date2026-09-29

UPDATED

Date2026-09-29

RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)

CVSS3

Base Score: 7.5

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H

CVSS4

Base Score: 8.7

Complexity: LOW

CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

IMPACT SCORE

3.6

EXPLOITABILITY

3.9

REFERENCES