Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cushman & Wakefield HospitalityCushman & Wakefield Hospitality
VS
ITC Hotels LimitedITC Hotels Limited
Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality

Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality

undefined, Chicago , undefined, undefined, US

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality (CWH) is a specialist division of Cushman & Wakefield, one of the world's largest commercial real estate services firm. CWH provides a range of services for hotels, resorts, serviced apartments and mixed-use developments. The divisio...

NAICS:721
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
ITC Hotels Limited

ITC Hotels Limited

ITC Limited, Hotels Division - Headquarters, ITC Green Centre 10, Institutional Area Sector 32, Gurugram, Haryana, IN, 122001

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
806/1000Good

Established in 1975, ITC Hotels Limited has grown to encompass over 140+ hotels across 90+ destinations, solidifying its presence in the Indian subcontinent ITC Hotels seamlessly blends India’s rich tradition of hospitality with globally benchmarked services, offering ...

NAICS:7211
NAICS Definition:Traveler Accommodation
Employees:12,682
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality

Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
ITC Hotels Limited

ITC Hotels Limited

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitality Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ITC Hotels Limited in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - ITC Hotels Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ITC Hotels Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality

Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
ITC Hotels Limited

ITC Hotels Limited

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality company and ITC Hotels Limited company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality and ITC Hotels Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality and ITC Hotels Limited, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality or ITC Hotels Limited ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality or ITC Hotels Limited ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality and ITC Hotels Limited, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield Hospitality and ITC Hotels Limited, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2