Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download
Analyze » Cushman & Wakefield » AUSCUS1780648477

Incident Score: Analysis & Impact (AUSCUS1780648477)

The details regarding individual company incidents & reports gives you full view from every side.

Rankiteo Score Impact Analysis

Rankiteo Incident Impact-91
Company Score Before Incident766 / 1000
Company Score After Incident675 / 1000
INCIDENT NUMBERAUSCUS1780648477
Type of Cyber IncidentRansomware
ATTACK VECTORNA
DATA EXPOSED115 TB
INCIDENT DATE30/04/2026
STATUSOngoing

Key Highlights From The Incident Analysis

  • Timeline of Cushman & Wakefield's Ransomware and lateral movement inside company's environment.
  • Overview of affected data sets, including SSNs and PHI, and why they materially increase incident severity.
  • How Rankiteo’s incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score.
  • How this cyber incident impacts Cushman & Wakefield Rankiteo cyber scoring and cyber rating.
  • Rankiteo’s MITRE ATT&CK correlation analysis for this incident, with associated confidence level.

Full Incident Analysis Transcript

In this Rankiteo incident briefing, we review the Cushman & Wakefield breach identified under incident ID AUSCUS1780648477.

The analysis begins with a detailed overview of Cushman & Wakefield's information like the linkedin page: https://www.linkedin.com/company/cushman-&-wakefield, the number of followers: 1841174, the industry type: Real Estate and the number of employees: 47355 employees

After the initial compromise, the video explains how Rankiteo's incident engine converts technical details into a normalized incident score. The incident score before the incident was 766 and after the incident was 675 with a difference of -91 which is could be a good indicator of the severity and impact of the incident.

In the next step of the video, we will analyze in more details the incident and the impact it had on Cushman & Wakefield and their customers.

On 31 May 2026, Menzies Group Pty Ltd disclosed Ransomware issues under the banner "Ransomware Attacks Surge in May 2026, Targeting Education and Business Sectors".

Ransomware activity rose in May 2026, with researchers at Comparitech recording 661 attacks worldwide, a 3% increase from April’s 640 incidents.

The disruption is felt across the environment, and exposing 115 TB.

In response, while recovery efforts such as Full restoration of operations (West Pharmaceutical Services) continue.

The case underscores how Ongoing.

Finally, we try to match the incident with the MITRE ATT&CK framework to see if there is any correlation between the incident and the MITRE ATT&CK framework.

The MITRE ATT&CK framework is a knowledge base of techniques and sub-techniques that are used to describe the tactics and procedures of cyber adversaries. It is a powerful tool for understanding the threat landscape and for developing effective defense strategies.

MITRE ATT&CK® Correlation Analysis

Rankiteo's analysis has identified several MITRE ATT&CK tactics and techniques associated with this incident, each with varying levels of confidence based on available evidence. Under the Initial Access tactic, the analysis identified Exploit Public-Facing Application (T1190) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware activity rose in May 2026, targeting education and business sectors, External Remote Services (T1133) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating confirmed cases included 35 businesses, seven government entities, and Phishing: Spearphishing Attachment (T1566.001) with lower confidence (40%), supported by evidence indicating no specific attack vector mentioned, but phishing is common in ransomware. Under the Execution tactic, the analysis identified User Execution: Malicious File (T1204.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains (Qilin, The Gentlemen, DragonForce) deployed and Command and Scripting Interpreter: Windows Command Shell (T1059.003) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware typically uses scripting for execution. Under the Persistence tactic, the analysis identified Scheduled Task/Job: Scheduled Task (T1053.005) with moderate confidence (50%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware often establishes persistence via scheduled tasks. Under the Privilege Escalation tactic, the analysis identified Exploitation for Privilege Escalation (T1068) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups often escalate privileges post-initial access. Under the Defense Evasion tactic, the analysis identified Obfuscated Files or Information (T1027) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains encrypt data and evade detection and Impair Defenses: Disable or Modify Tools (T1562.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware often disables security tools. Under the Credential Access tactic, the analysis identified OS Credential Dumping: LSASS Memory (T1003.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups commonly dump credentials. Under the Discovery tactic, the analysis identified Account Discovery: Domain Account (T1087.002) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups map networks and discover accounts and File and Directory Discovery (T1083) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware identifies high-value data for exfiltration. Under the Lateral Movement tactic, the analysis identified Remote Services: Remote Desktop Protocol (T1021.001) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware often moves laterally via RDP. Under the Collection tactic, the analysis identified Data from Local System (T1005) with moderate to high confidence (80%), supported by evidence indicating 115 TB of data stolen by ransomware groups and Data from Network Shared Drive (T1039) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating corporate data compromised across multiple sectors. Under the Command and Control tactic, the analysis identified Application Layer Protocol: Web Protocols (T1071.001) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups use C2 channels for data exfiltration. Under the Exfiltration tactic, the analysis identified Exfiltration Over C2 Channel (T1041) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating 115 TB of data exfiltrated by Qilin, The Gentlemen, DragonForce and Exfiltration Over Web Service: Exfiltration to Cloud Storage (T1567.002) with moderate confidence (60%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware groups often exfiltrate data to cloud services. Under the Impact tactic, the analysis identified Data Encrypted for Impact (T1486) with high confidence (90%), supported by evidence indicating ransomware strains encrypted data across 661 attacks and Service Stop (T1489) with moderate to high confidence (70%), supported by evidence indicating west Pharmaceutical Services took two weeks to restore operations. These correlations help security teams understand the attack chain and develop appropriate defensive measures based on the observed tactics and techniques.