Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cushman & WakefieldCushman & Wakefield
VS
JLLJLL
Cushman & Wakefield

Cushman & Wakefield

225 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, 60606, US

Last Update: 05/06/2026

View Profile
653/1000Weak

As a global commercial real estate services leader with 52,000 professionals worldwide, we will never settle for the world that’s been built, but relentlessly drive it forward for our clients, colleagues and communities. #BetterNeverSettles

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:47,355
Subsidiaries:9
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2
JLL

JLL

200 East Randolph Drive, Chicago, Illinois, US, 60601

Last Update: 15/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://co.jll/4ozAe4W
792/1000Fair

We’re a leading professional services firm that specializes in real estate and investment management. JLL shapes the future of real estate for a better world by using the most advanced technology to create rewarding opportunities, amazing spaces and sustainable real est...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:102,392
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cushman & Wakefield

Cushman & Wakefield

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
JLL

JLL

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

Cushman & Wakefield has 12.99% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JLL in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cushman & Wakefield (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cushman & Wakefield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - JLL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JLL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cushman & Wakefield

Cushman & Wakefield

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CARADTSALCUS1778027258
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AUSCUS1780648477
JLL

JLL

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield company and JLL company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield and JLL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield and JLL, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cushman & Wakefield or JLL ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cushman & Wakefield or JLL ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield and JLL, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cushman & Wakefield and JLL, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
Cushman-&-wakefield vs Jll - Cyber Risk Comparison & Security Rating | Rankiteo