Comparison Overview
Cushman & Wakefield

Cushman & Wakefield
225 West Wacker Drive, Chicago, 60606, US
Last Update: 05/06/2026
As a global commercial real estate services leader with 52,000 professionals worldwide, we will never settle for the world that’s been built, but relentlessly drive it forward for our clients, colleagues and communities. #BetterNeverSettles

International Workplace Group plc
Dammstrasse 19, Zug, Switzerland, CH, CH-6300
Last Update: 16/09/2026
IWG: the world’s leading platform for work, revolutionising how and where people work IWG (International Workplace Group) is the global leader in hybrid and platform working. With 4,000+ locations across 120 countries and millions of customers worldwide, IWG empowers bu...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cushman & Wakefield







International Workplace Group plc






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
Cushman & Wakefield has 13.64% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Real Estate Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for International Workplace Group plc in 2026.
Incident History - Cushman & Wakefield (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cushman & Wakefield cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - International Workplace Group plc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
International Workplace Group plc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cushman & Wakefield

International Workplace Group plc
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.