Comparison Overview
CDES

CDES
Chemin de l'Usine, LUZANCY, 77138, FR
Last Update: 01/04/2026
𝗟𝗲𝗮𝗱𝗲𝗿 𝗳𝗿𝗮𝗻𝗰̧𝗮𝗶𝘀 𝗱𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗿𝗮𝘃𝗮𝘂𝘅 𝗲𝗻 𝗺𝗶𝗹𝗶𝗲𝘂𝘅 𝗮𝗾𝘂𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗾𝘂𝗲𝘀. CDES, c’est 100 experts engagés et passionnés, qui mettent chaque jour leur savoir-faire au service de la préservation et la valorisation des milieux aquatiques. Avec nos 3...

Fugro
Veurse Achterweg 10, Leidschendam, 2264 SG, NL
Last Update: 13/09/2026
We are the world’s leading Geo-data specialist, collecting and analysing comprehensive information about the Earth and the structures built upon it. Through integrated data acquisition, analysis and advice, we unlock insights from Geo-data to help our clients design, bu...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CDES







Fugro






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CDES in 2026.
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fugro in 2026.
Incident History - CDES (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CDES cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Fugro (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fugro cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CDES

Fugro
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.