Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CUNY School of Labor and Urban StudiesCUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies
VS
Deakin UniversityDeakin University
CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies

CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies

25 W 43rd St, New York, undefined, 10036, US

Last Update: 15/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://slu.cuny.edu
770/1000Fair

The CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies (SLU) offers undergraduate and graduate degree programs in Labor Studies and Urban Studies that are designed to meet the needs of working adults as well as traditional-age college students who seek to learn more about the chall...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:88
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Deakin University

Deakin University

221 Burwood Highway, Burwood, victoria, AU, 3125

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.deakin.edu.au/
755/1000Fair

Deakin’s unique identity – rooted in balanced excellence in education and research – has been driving lasting change for a better future since 1974. Over our 50+ year history, Deakin has grown to be one of the top universities worldwide with a truly global presence. Our...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:10,793
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies

CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Deakin University

Deakin University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Deakin University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Deakin University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Deakin University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies

CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Deakin University

Deakin University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DEA3929722

FAQ

Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies company and Deakin University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies and Deakin University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies and Deakin University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies or Deakin University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies or Deakin University ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies and Deakin University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CUNY School of Labor and Urban Studies and Deakin University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3