Comparison Overview
Culina (part of the COMO Group)

Culina (part of the COMO Group)
24 Senoko Way, undefined, undefined, 758046, SG
Last Update: 01/04/2026
The Destinations for Epicureans Established in 1994, Culina is Singapore’s leading food and beverage distributor, specialising in fine wines, fresh produce, premium cuts of meat and quality foods from Australia, New Zealand, France, Italy and beyond. HACCP (Hazard An...

VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED
Plot No. 31, Sector 44, Gurugram, Haryana, IN, 122002
Last Update: 05/09/2026
Varun Beverages Limited (VBL) is one of the top FMCG players in the Indian Market. We are on track towards strengthening our position in the global beverage industry with our presence in 14 countries in the Indian sub-continent and Africa - where we are responsible for ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Culina (part of the COMO Group)







VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Culina (part of the COMO Group) in 2026.
Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED in 2026.
Incident History - Culina (part of the COMO Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Culina (part of the COMO Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED (X = Date, Y = Severity)
VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Culina (part of the COMO Group)

VARUN BEVERAGES LIMITED
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.