Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Culina (part of the COMO Group)Culina (part of the COMO Group)
VS
JDE Peet'sJDE Peet's
Culina (part of the COMO Group)

Culina (part of the COMO Group)

24 Senoko Way, undefined, undefined, 758046, SG

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.culina.com.sg
762/1000Fair

The Destinations for Epicureans Established in 1994, Culina is Singapore’s leading food and beverage distributor, specialising in fine wines, fresh produce, premium cuts of meat and quality foods from Australia, New Zealand, France, Italy and beyond. HACCP (Hazard An...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:117
Subsidiaries:27
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
JDE Peet's

JDE Peet's

Oosterdoksstraat 80, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1011 DK

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.jdepeets.com/
801/1000Good

JDE Peet’s is the world’s leading pure-play coffee company, serving approximately 4,400 cups of coffee per second in more than 100 markets. Guided by our ‘Reignite the Amazing’ strategy, we are focusing on brand-led growth across three big bets: Peet’s, L’OR, and Jacobs...

NAICS:722
NAICS Definition:Food Services and Drinking Places
Employees:10,426
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Culina (part of the COMO Group)

Culina (part of the COMO Group)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
JDE Peet's

JDE Peet's

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Culina (part of the COMO Group) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Food and Beverage Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for JDE Peet's in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Culina (part of the COMO Group) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Culina (part of the COMO Group) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - JDE Peet's (X = Date, Y = Severity)

JDE Peet's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Culina (part of the COMO Group)

Culina (part of the COMO Group)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
JDE Peet's

JDE Peet's

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) company and JDE Peet's company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) and JDE Peet's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) and JDE Peet's, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Culina (part of the COMO Group) or JDE Peet's ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Culina (part of the COMO Group) or JDE Peet's ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) and JDE Peet's, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Culina (part of the COMO Group) and JDE Peet's, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA