Comparison Overview
University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering & Applied Science
University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering & Applied Science
1111 Engineering Drive, Boulder, CO, 80309, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Founded in 1893, the College of Engineering and Applied Science at the University of Colorado Boulder is the second largest of seven schools and colleges at one of the nation's top public research institutions. As Colorado's flagship university, CU Boulder has selective...
University of North Texas
1155 Union Circle #311277, Denton, Tx, US, 76203-1277
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Ranked a Tier One research university by the Carnegie Classification, UNT is the flagship of the UNT System and is located in Denton, Texas. With 242 degree programs and a thriving community of nearly 44,000 students, UNT serves the North Texas region and helps drive th...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering & Applied Science
University of North Texas
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering & Applied Science in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of North Texas in 2026.
Incident History - University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering & Applied Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering & Applied Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of North Texas (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of North Texas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
University of Colorado Boulder College of Engineering & Applied Science
University of North Texas
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
A vulnerability was determined in a2aproject a2a-rs up to 0.4.3. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file a2a-server/src/error.rs. Executing a manipulation can lead to information exposure through error message. The attack can be executed remotely. This patch is called 713b943af94ab2d521d483b841618b97a2e78a4d. A patch should be applied to remediate this issue.
IBM Cyber Fraud 1.0.0 through 1.0.2 has a missing secure attribute allowing sensitive cookies to be transmitted over unencrypted connections, potentially enabling an attacker to intercept session data through network-based attacks.
IBM Carbon Charts 0.4.0 through 1.27.19 is vulnerable to cross-site scripting. The MeterChart component's Title.truncateTitle() function re-inserts a substring of user-supplied label text into the DOM via an unsanitized innerHTML write when the title exceeds the available container width. A remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary JavaScript in the victim's browser session.
IBM Sterling Connect Direct for Unix 6.4.0.0 through 6.4.0.6 and 6.3.0.0 through 6.3.0.7 apnotify utility is vulnerable to a code injection due to insufficient validation of user input.
IBM i 7.3, 7.4, 7.5, and 7.6 could allow an unathenticated remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to improper access control. By sending a specially crafted HTTP request to any URL within the Navigator application prior to authentication, a bad actor could exploit this vulnerability to alter server-side session security state.