Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

University of Colorado BoulderUniversity of Colorado Boulder
VS
Stanford UniversityStanford University
University of Colorado Boulder

University of Colorado Boulder

914 Broadway St, Boulder, Colorado, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://colorado.edu
765/1000Fair

The University of Colorado Boulder is Colorado’s leading public research university, transforming lives since 1876. As the state's flagship university and one of only 38 U.S. public research institutions in the Association of American Universities (AAU), CU Boulder has...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:16,037
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Stanford University

Stanford University

450 Jane Stanford Way, Stanford, CA, US, 94305

Last Update: 18/08/2026

View Profile
Between 600 and 649
http://stanford.edu
604/1000Poor

Stanford University pursues its founding mission of research and education with a spirit of optimism and possibility. Stanford catalyzes discoveries, accelerates the human impact of its research, educates students in a culture of expansive inquiry and freedom of thought...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:28,572
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
University of Colorado Boulder

University of Colorado Boulder

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Stanford University

Stanford University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for University of Colorado Boulder in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

Stanford University has 288.35% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - University of Colorado Boulder (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of Colorado Boulder cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Stanford University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Stanford University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
University of Colorado Boulder

University of Colorado Boulder

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
UNI222771222
Stanford University

Stanford University

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
STA1787078086
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
UNISTAINSHAR1778200829
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
STAVICINSHAR1778218101

FAQ

Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder company and Stanford University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder and Stanford University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder and Stanford University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - University of Colorado Boulder or Stanford University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - University of Colorado Boulder or Stanford University ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder and Stanford University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between University of Colorado Boulder and Stanford University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-86150
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. Impacted is an unknown function of the file custom-x/softap/hostapd. Such manipulation of the argument wpa_passphrase leads to hard-coded credentials. The attack can be launched remotely. The exploit has been disclosed publicly and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 3.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:P/I:N/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86149
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This issue affects some unknown processing of the file Net/NetCheckPing.cpp. This manipulation of the argument interface_name/host causes os command injection. The attack can be initiated remotely.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86148
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Tenda CP3 27.5.57.101. This vulnerability affects the function SystemAsh of the file Apis/system.c of the component Kylin. The manipulation of the argument AlarmVoiceURL results in os command injection. It is possible to launch the attack remotely.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS2
Base Score: 8.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:M/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-86206
SUMMARY

A vulnerability in the N-central internal API access control filter allows unauthorised access to internal APIs. This is fixed in N-central 2026.3 HF3 and 2026.4

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-86060
SUMMARY

RouterOS contains an argument-handling flaw in the SSH login path involving usernames that begin with a prohibited character, allowing for the trusted RouterOS policy mask to be changed, leading to privilege escalation. Exploitation requires an unauthenticated SSH session to reach the RouterOS login helper.This issue was fixed in versions: 6.49.21 (Long-term), 7.23.4 (Long-term) and 7.24.2 (Stable)

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-05
UPDATED
Date2026-09-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA