Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CSXCSX
VS
TrenitaliaTrenitalia
CSX

CSX

500 Water Street, None, Jacksonville, FL, US, 32202

Last Update: 09/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.csx.com
822/1000Good

CSX is a company on the move. As the nation’s best run railroad, we’re redefining freight rail with a progressive vision and real results – setting new industry performance standards and building a force of highly skilled professionals who are energized to help us move ...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:12,763
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Trenitalia

Trenitalia

Piazza della Croce Rossa n. 1, ROMA, IT, 00161

Last Update: 30/06/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.trenitalia.com
730/1000Moderate

Trenitalia, the Ferrovie dello Stato Group's company for the transportation of passengers and the provision of logistics services for goods, is one of Europe’s largest rail operators. Trenitalia's mission is to provide services, in a domestic and European context, able...

NAICS:482
NAICS Definition:Rail Transportation
Employees:10,235
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CSX

CSX

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Trenitalia

Trenitalia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CSX in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Rail Transportation Industry Avg (This Year)

Trenitalia has 3.85% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CSX (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CSX cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Trenitalia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Trenitalia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CSX

CSX

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CSX201072525
Trenitalia

Trenitalia

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
TRE1782851855

FAQ

Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CSX company and Trenitalia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CSX and Trenitalia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CSX and Trenitalia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CSX or Trenitalia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CSX or Trenitalia ?
Between CSX and Trenitalia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CSX and Trenitalia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1