Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CSUSM Temecula CampusCSUSM Temecula Campus
VS
USP - Universidade de São PauloUSP - Universidade de São Paulo
CSUSM Temecula Campus

CSUSM Temecula Campus

43890 Margarita Road, Temecula, 92592, US

Last Update: 25/01/2026

View Profile
770/1000Fair

California State University San Marcos Temecula Campus is dedicated to expanding access to higher education in the Southwest Riverside County. With the help of the local municipalities, we have been able to graduate over 1000 alumni from our programs at our campus. We o...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:40
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
USP - Universidade de São Paulo

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

Rua da Reitoria, 109, Cidade Universitária, São Paulo, São Paulo, BR, 05508-900

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.usp.br/
818/1000Good

A Universidade de São Paulo (USP) é uma universidade pública, mantida pelo Estado de São Paulo e ligada à Secretaria de Desenvolvimento Econômico, Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação (SDECTI). O talento e dedicação dos docentes, alunos e funcionários têm sido reconhecidos po...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:22,604
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CSUSM Temecula Campus

CSUSM Temecula Campus

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
USP - Universidade de São Paulo

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CSUSM Temecula Campus in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for USP - Universidade de São Paulo in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CSUSM Temecula Campus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CSUSM Temecula Campus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - USP - Universidade de São Paulo (X = Date, Y = Severity)

USP - Universidade de São Paulo cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CSUSM Temecula Campus

CSUSM Temecula Campus

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
USP - Universidade de São Paulo

USP - Universidade de São Paulo

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus company and USP - Universidade de São Paulo company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus and USP - Universidade de São Paulo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus and USP - Universidade de São Paulo, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CSUSM Temecula Campus or USP - Universidade de São Paulo ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CSUSM Temecula Campus or USP - Universidade de São Paulo ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus and USP - Universidade de São Paulo, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CSUSM Temecula Campus and USP - Universidade de São Paulo, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8