Comparison Overview
California State University San Marcos

California State University San Marcos
333 S Twin Oaks Valley Rd, San Marcos, ca, 92096-0001, US
Last Update: 25/04/2026
Cutting-edge research meets hands-on application at our campus and in the real world. California State University San Marcos is a new kind of university, pushing the boundaries of innovation to prepare tomorrow's leaders, build stronger communities and solve pressin...

University of Connecticut
352 Mansfield Road, Storrs, CT, US, 06269
Last Update: 02/04/2026
The University of Connecticut (UConn), a Wall Street Journal top 10 public university, is home to more than 32,000 students, 1,500 faculty, 255,000 proud alumni, and a handsome husky named Jonathan. The University has fourteen schools and colleges: Agriculture and Natu...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

California State University San Marcos







University of Connecticut






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for California State University San Marcos in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for University of Connecticut in 2026.
Incident History - California State University San Marcos (X = Date, Y = Severity)
California State University San Marcos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - University of Connecticut (X = Date, Y = Severity)
University of Connecticut cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

California State University San Marcos

University of Connecticut
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.
JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/3ea9cad8699714dc072fade29d36be0d1e23d708
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/733eb353dca7b0ea0252e724445b6defa29c393e
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/86b7ba7801988aadb1a67555629522a71d603bd3
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/pull/2000
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.0.16
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.2.1
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/security/advisories/GHSA-2r2c-cx56-8933
JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/0389f0ee6d0375901b602671ad5dafd4d1d4ee09
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/4ee3a73849ffb9a85ec748e4e8cd8f6d81f84f40
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/commit/934f09e6128cee33c2b13d42b6e859c1ee2d194b
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/pull/2000
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/pull/2001
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.0.16
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/4.2.1
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/releases/tag/jline-3.30.14
- https://github.com/jline/jline3/security/advisories/GHSA-47qp-hqvx-6r3f
Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.
Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.