Comparison Overview
California State University San Marcos

California State University San Marcos
333 S Twin Oaks Valley Rd, San Marcos, ca, 92096-0001, US
Last Update: 25/04/2026
Cutting-edge research meets hands-on application at our campus and in the real world. California State University San Marcos is a new kind of university, pushing the boundaries of innovation to prepare tomorrow's leaders, build stronger communities and solve pressin...

School of Visual Arts
209 East 23rd Street, New York, ny, US, 10010
Last Update: 02/04/2026
School of Visual Arts has been a leader in the education of artists, designers, and creative professionals for more than seven decades. With a faculty of distinguished working professionals, a dynamic curriculum, and an emphasis on critical thinking, SVA is a catalyst f...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

California State University San Marcos







School of Visual Arts






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for California State University San Marcos in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for School of Visual Arts in 2026.
Incident History - California State University San Marcos (X = Date, Y = Severity)
California State University San Marcos cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - School of Visual Arts (X = Date, Y = Severity)
School of Visual Arts cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

California State University San Marcos

School of Visual Arts
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.
Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.
IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.