Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CSTEP Project L.A.W.CSTEP Project L.A.W.
VS
Lund UniversityLund University
CSTEP Project L.A.W.

CSTEP Project L.A.W.

25 West 43 Street, New York, 10036, US

Last Update: 05/12/2025

View Profile

Project Leadership, Achievement, and Work (LAW) is a fully online, synchronous 10-week program designed to prepare qualified underrepresented and economically disadvantaged individuals for entry to, and successful matriculation in, CUNY School of Law or other programs f...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Lund University

Lund University

Lund University, Box 117, Lund, SE, 221 00

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
796/1000Fair

Lund University has around 46 000 students and 8 600 staff based in Lund, Helsingborg and Malmö. We are united in our efforts to understand, explain and improve our world and the human condition. Lund is considered one of the most popular study locations in Sweden. The...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:10,054
Subsidiaries:20
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CSTEP Project L.A.W.

CSTEP Project L.A.W.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Lund University

Lund University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CSTEP Project L.A.W. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Lund University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CSTEP Project L.A.W. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CSTEP Project L.A.W. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Lund University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Lund University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CSTEP Project L.A.W.

CSTEP Project L.A.W.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Lund University

Lund University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. company and Lund University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. and Lund University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. and Lund University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CSTEP Project L.A.W. or Lund University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CSTEP Project L.A.W. or Lund University ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. and Lund University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CSTEP Project L.A.W. and Lund University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA