Comparison Overview

CSL

VS

ERM

CSL

One Cowboys Way, Suite 325, Frisco, TX, US, 75034
Last Update: 2025-08-05 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900

Strong

Successfully delivering best-in-class services for the most visible and iconic venues, destinations and sports teams across the globe. CSL brings experience from over 2,500 prior engagements to the planning phases of your project. Our consultants will thoroughly and effectively evaluate the various market demand, program planning, financial, economic, funding, sponsorship valuation and other factors that will determine short and long-term success. CSL is a subsidiary of global premium experiences company Legends.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 56
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

ERM

33 St Mary Axe, London, undefined, EC3A 8AA, GB
Last Update: 2025-03-04 (UTC)

Strong

Between 800 and 900

Sustainability is our business. As the worldโ€™s largest specialist sustainability consultancy, ERM partners with clients to operationalize sustainability at pace and scale, deploying a unique combination of strategic transformation and technical delivery capabilities. This approach helps clients to accelerate the integration of sustainability at every level of their business. With more than 50 years of experience, ERMโ€™s diverse team of 8000+ experts in 40 countries and territories helps clients create innovative solutions to their sustainability challenges, unlocking commercial opportunities that meet the needs of today while preserving opportunity for future generations.

NAICS: 5416
NAICS Definition: Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees: 10,370
Subsidiaries: 7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cslintl.jpeg
CSL
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/erm.jpeg
ERM
โ€”
ISO 27001
Not verified
โ€”
SOC 2
Not verified
โ€”
GDPR
No public badge
โ€”
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
CSL
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
ERM
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CSL in 2025.

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for ERM in 2025.

Incident History โ€” CSL (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CSL cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History โ€” ERM (X = Date, Y = Severity)

ERM cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cslintl.jpeg
CSL
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/erm.jpeg
ERM
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both CSL company and ERM company demonstrate a comparable AI risk posture, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, ERM company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CSL company.

In the current year, ERM company and CSL company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither ERM company nor CSL company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither ERM company nor CSL company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither ERM company nor CSL company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CSL company nor ERM company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

ERM company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to CSL company.

ERM company employs more people globally than CSL company, reflecting its scale as a Business Consulting and Services.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

pwn.college DOJO is an education platform for learning cybersecurity. In versions up to and including commit 781d91157cfc234a434d0bab45cbcf97894c642e, the /workspace endpoint contains an improper authentication vulnerability that allows an attacker to access any active Windows VM without proper authorization. The vulnerability occurs in the view_desktop function where the user is retrieved via a URL parameter without verifying that the requester has administrative privileges. An attacker can supply any user ID and arbitrary password in the request parameters to impersonate another user. When requesting a Windows desktop service, the function does not validate the supplied password before generating access credentials, allowing the attacker to obtain an iframe source URL that grants full access to the target user's Windows VM. This impacts all users with active Windows VMs, as an attacker can access and modify data on the Windows machine and in the home directory of the associated Linux machine via the Z: drive. This issue has been patched in commit 467db0b9ea0d9a929dc89b41f6eb59f7cfc68bef. No known workarounds exist.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:L/SC:H/SI:H/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Experience Manager versions 11.6 and earlier are affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victimโ€™s browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must open a malicious link. Scope is changed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

Adobe Connect versions 12.9 and earlier are affected by a URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to redirect users to malicious websites. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must click on a crafted link.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N