Comparison Overview

Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF)

VS

Pew Research Center

Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF)

Office #2013 Level 20, SIT Tower, Dubai, 3372, AE
Last Update: 2025-12-14
Between 700 and 749

The Center for the Study of Global Economic Futures (CSGEF) was established in Dubai, UAE in 2021, is a multidisciplinary policy research organization to scrutinize the socioeconomic and systemic forces that bear upon the future of the worldwide financial system. The aim is to offer an extraordinary methodical prospect on the socioeconomic and systemic forces that sustains the future of the global economy. We aspire to become an essential keystone for global policy makers who are interested in evaluating strategic economic reforms at work of the domestic structures of production, competition, dialogical interaction, coordination and integration with the global economy. We strive for sustainably secure, peaceful and prosperous global economic future by imparting production of quality research and anticipating, disseminating and educating by way of public policy recommendations, establishing partnerships with policy makers, research institute academic and the media, global discussion forums, and forefront scenario analysis. We have developed several research programs mentioned below: - The Future of Money, Currency Program (FMC) - Future of Economic Anthropology Program (FEA) - Future AI & Digital Economy Program (FAIDE) - Future of Global Supply Chain & Trade Program (GSC&T) - The Future of Finance Banking & Monetary Policy Program (FBM) - Future of Global Economic Security Program (GES) - The Future of Global Economic Governance Program GEG) - Program of The Future of Energy (PFE) - The Future of Knowledge & Innovation Program (KIP) - The Future of Economic Powers & Geoeconomics Program - Global, Regional and National Development Planes (GRAND) The goal is to become a knowledge reference for policy makers, conduct research that address the driving forces shaping the outlook of the international economy in the coming decades.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 6
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Pew Research Center

1615 L St NW, Washington, District of Columbia, 20036, US
Last Update: 2025-12-11
Between 750 and 799

Pew Research Center is a nonpartisan fact tank that informs the public about the issues, attitudes and trends shaping the world. It conducts public opinion polling, demographic research, media content analysis and other empirical social science research. Pew Research does not take policy positions. It is a subsidiary of The Pew Charitable Trusts.

NAICS: 54172
NAICS Definition: Research and Development in the Social Sciences and Humanities
Employees: 232
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/csgef.jpeg
Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF)
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pew-research-center.jpeg
Pew Research Center
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF)
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Pew Research Center
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) in 2025.

Incidents vs Think Tanks Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Pew Research Center in 2025.

Incident History — Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Pew Research Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Pew Research Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/csgef.jpeg
Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF)
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/pew-research-center.jpeg
Pew Research Center
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Pew Research Center company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Pew Research Center company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) company.

In the current year, Pew Research Center company and Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Pew Research Center company nor Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Pew Research Center company nor Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Pew Research Center company nor Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) company nor Pew Research Center company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) nor Pew Research Center holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) company nor Pew Research Center company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Pew Research Center company employs more people globally than Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) company, reflecting its scale as a Think Tanks.

Neither Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) nor Pew Research Center holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) nor Pew Research Center holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) nor Pew Research Center holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) nor Pew Research Center holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) nor Pew Research Center holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Centre for the Study of Global Economic Future (CSGEF) nor Pew Research Center holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Zerobyte is a backup automation tool Zerobyte versions prior to 0.18.5 and 0.19.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability where authentication middleware is not properly applied to API endpoints. This results in certain API endpoints being accessible without valid session credentials. This is dangerous for those who have exposed Zerobyte to be used outside of their internal network. A fix has been applied in both version 0.19.0 and 0.18.5. If immediate upgrade is not possible, restrict network access to the Zerobyte instance to trusted networks only using firewall rules or network segmentation. This is only a temporary mitigation; upgrading is strongly recommended.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
Description

Open Source Point of Sale (opensourcepos) is a web based point of sale application written in PHP using CodeIgniter framework. Starting in version 3.4.0 and prior to version 3.4.2, a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability exists in the application's filter configuration. The CSRF protection mechanism was **explicitly disabled**, allowing the application to process state-changing requests (POST) without verifying a valid CSRF token. An unauthenticated remote attacker can exploit this by hosting a malicious web page. If a logged-in administrator visits this page, their browser is forced to send unauthorized requests to the application. A successful exploit allows the attacker to silently create a new Administrator account with full privileges, leading to a complete takeover of the system and loss of confidentiality, integrity, and availability. The vulnerability has been patched in version 3.4.2. The fix re-enables the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` and resolves associated AJAX race conditions by adjusting token regeneration settings. As a workaround, administrators can manually re-enable the CSRF filter in `app/Config/Filters.php` by uncommenting the protection line. However, this is not recommended without applying the full patch, as it may cause functionality breakage in the Sales module due to token synchronization issues.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Model Context Protocol (MCP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious MCP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered automatically without any user interaction besides opening the project in the IDE. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Zed, a code editor, has an aribtrary code execution vulnerability in versions prior to 0.218.2-pre. The Zed IDE loads Language Server Protocol (LSP) configurations from the `settings.json` file located within a project’s `.zed` subdirectory. A malicious LSP configuration can contain arbitrary shell commands that run on the host system with the privileges of the user running the IDE. This can be triggered when a user opens project file for which there is an LSP entry. A concerted effort by an attacker to seed a project settings file (`./zed/settings.json`) with malicious language server configurations could result in arbitrary code execution with the user's privileges if the user opens the project in Zed without reviewing the contents. Version 0.218.2-pre fixes the issue by implementing worktree trust mechanism. As a workaround, users should carefully review the contents of project settings files (`./zed/settings.json`) before opening new projects in Zed.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.7
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Storybook is a frontend workshop for building user interface components and pages in isolation. A vulnerability present starting in versions 7.0.0 and prior to versions 7.6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, and 10.1.10 relates to Storybook’s handling of environment variables defined in a `.env` file, which could, in specific circumstances, lead to those variables being unexpectedly bundled into the artifacts created by the `storybook build` command. When a built Storybook is published to the web, the bundle’s source is viewable, thus potentially exposing those variables to anyone with access. For a project to potentially be vulnerable to this issue, it must build the Storybook (i.e. run `storybook build` directly or indirectly) in a directory that contains a `.env` file (including variants like `.env.local`) and publish the built Storybook to the web. Storybooks built without a `.env` file at build time are not affected, including common CI-based builds where secrets are provided via platform environment variables rather than `.env` files. Storybook runtime environments (i.e. `storybook dev`) are not affected. Deployed applications that share a repo with your Storybook are not affected. Users should upgrade their Storybook—on both their local machines and CI environment—to version .6.21, 8.6.15, 9.1.17, or 10.1.10 as soon as possible. Maintainers additionally recommend that users audit for any sensitive secrets provided via `.env` files and rotate those keys. Some projects may have been relying on the undocumented behavior at the heart of this issue and will need to change how they reference environment variables after this update. If a project can no longer read necessary environmental variable values, either prefix the variables with `STORYBOOK_` or use the `env` property in Storybook’s configuration to manually specify values. In either case, do not include sensitive secrets as they will be included in the built bundle.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L