Comparison Overview
Department of Computer Science and Engineering Texas A&M University

Department of Computer Science and Engineering Texas A&M University
301 Harvey R. Bright Building, College Station, TX, 77843-3112, US
Last Update: 26/12/2025
Our mission is to develop the human and intellectual resources needed to meet the future technological challenges in the field of computing. This includes developing computer scientists and computer engineers for positions of leadership in industry, government and acade...

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
Avda. Libertador Bernardo OHiggins 340, Santiago, 8320000, CL
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Founded in 1888, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile is currently one of the leading higher education institutions in Latin America. Approximately 22,000 students are enrolled in graduate and undergraduate programs, which encompass a wide range of disciplines an...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Department of Computer Science and Engineering Texas A&M University







Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Department of Computer Science and Engineering Texas A&M University in 2026.
Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile in 2026.
Incident History - Department of Computer Science and Engineering Texas A&M University (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Department of Computer Science and Engineering Texas A&M University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Department of Computer Science and Engineering Texas A&M University

Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
FlatPress versions prior to commit 10be83c, contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in comment and contact forms where name, URL, and email fields are rendered without proper output encoding in Smarty templates. Attackers can inject arbitrary HTML and JavaScript through these fields to execute malicious scripts in browsers of viewers including administrators, or bypass URL scheme validation to inject javascript: or data: URIs.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 use the attacker-controlled `HTTP_HOST` request header as the authoritative source for building callback URLs in its OIDC, SAML, and logout authentication flows without any validation. An unauthenticated attacker can poison the `redirect_uri` sent to the Identity Provider, causing the IdP to redirect the victim's authorization code to an attacker-controlled server - resulting in full account takeover with no credentials required. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Snipe-IT is an IT asset/license management system. In versions prior to 8.6.0, a user with only users.edit can send a PATCH to /api/v1/users/{their_own_id} and grant themselves any permission except admin and superuser — for example `assets.view`, `assets.create`, `reports.view`, import, etc. The issue is patched in version 8.6.0.
Poweradmin is a web-based DNS administration tool for PowerDNS server. Versions prior to 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 are vulnerable to CSV Injection (Formula Injection) in its log export functionality. User-controlled data — specifically the username field — is written to exported CSV files without sanitizing formula trigger characters (=, +, -, @). When an administrator exports activity logs and opens the resulting CSV in a spreadsheet application (Microsoft Excel, LibreOffice Calc, Google Sheets), any formula stored in a username is executed by the application. This can be used for phishing attacks against administrators or data exfiltration. Versions 4.2.4 and 4.3.3 patch the issue.
Fortra File Integrity Monitoring (FIM), formerly Tripwire Enterprise, versions prior to 9.4.0 may assign incorrect or elevated effective permissions to users created by the tetool import command while FIM is running, particularly when the import also creates or changes roles or role-permission relationships.