Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CSC - IT Center for ScienceCSC - IT Center for Science
VS
Allianz TechnologyAllianz Technology
CSC - IT Center for Science

CSC - IT Center for Science

Keilaranta 14, Espoo, 02101, FI

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.csc.fi
676/1000Weak

CSC – IT Center for Science is a Finnish center of expertise in information technology owned by the Finnish state and higher education institutions. We provide internationally high-quality ICT expert services for higher education institutions, research institutes, cultu...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:680
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Allianz Technology

Allianz Technology

Dieselstraße 8, Unterföhring, Bavaria, DE, 85774

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile

With its headquarters in Munich, Germany, Allianz Technology is Allianz's global IT service provider and delivers IT solutions that drive the group's digitalization. With more than 11,000 employees in more than 20 countries around the world, Allianz Technology is tasked...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:11,516
Subsidiaries:130
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CSC - IT Center for Science

CSC - IT Center for Science

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Allianz Technology

Allianz Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

CSC - IT Center for Science has 33.77% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CSC - IT Center for Science (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CSC - IT Center for Science cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Allianz Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CSC - IT Center for Science

CSC - IT Center for Science

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CSC1770409977
Allianz Technology

Allianz Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science company and Allianz Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science and Allianz Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science and Allianz Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CSC - IT Center for Science or Allianz Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CSC - IT Center for Science or Allianz Technology ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science and Allianz Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CSC - IT Center for Science and Allianz Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA