Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CS GROUP - CanadaCS GROUP - Canada
VS
Tecnicas ReunidasTecnicas Reunidas
CS GROUP - Canada

CS GROUP - Canada

400 Avenue Sainte-Croix, Suite 2300, Montreal, Quebec, CA, H4N 3L4

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cscanada.ca
752/1000Fair

CS Group Canada accelerates the commercialization of safety-critical embedded systems with innovative solutions that implement Functional Safety and OT Cybersecurity. 150 skilled engineers can complement internal teams for ISO 26262/DO-178C architecture and certificati...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:179
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Tecnicas Reunidas

Tecnicas Reunidas

Avenida de Burgos, 89, Madrid, Community of Madrid, ES

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
762/1000Fair

TR is an international general contractor engaged in the engineering and construction of industrial facilities in the fields of: -Oil & Gas -Refining & Petrochemical -Power Generation -Infrastructures and industries -Energy Transition Engaging in the engineering, desi...

NAICS:54139
NAICS Definition:Engineering Services
Employees:11,604
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CS GROUP - Canada

CS GROUP - Canada

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Tecnicas Reunidas

Tecnicas Reunidas

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CS GROUP - Canada in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Engineering Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tecnicas Reunidas in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CS GROUP - Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CS GROUP - Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Tecnicas Reunidas (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tecnicas Reunidas cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CS GROUP - Canada

CS GROUP - Canada

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Tecnicas Reunidas

Tecnicas Reunidas

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada company and Tecnicas Reunidas company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada and Tecnicas Reunidas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada and Tecnicas Reunidas, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CS GROUP - Canada or Tecnicas Reunidas ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CS GROUP - Canada or Tecnicas Reunidas ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada and Tecnicas Reunidas, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CS GROUP - Canada and Tecnicas Reunidas, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8