Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CrushFTP, LLCCrushFTP, LLC
VS
IndraIndra
CrushFTP, LLC

CrushFTP, LLC

Lake Tahoe, 89449-4470, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
https://www.crushftp.com/
747/1000Moderate

Put simply, CrushFTP is a secure high speed file transfer server that runs on almost any OS. It handles a wide array of protocols, and security options. It gives the server administrator the ability to customize, monitor, and control every aspect of the server’s operati...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:3
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Indra

Indra

Avda. Bruselas, 35, Madrid, 28108, ES

Last Update: 01/07/2026

View Profile
684/1000Weak

Indra Group (https://www.indragroup.com/) is the foremost Spanish multinational and one of the leading European companies that focus on defence and advanced technologies. It stands at the forefront of the defence, space, air traffic management, mobility, and Information...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:39,371
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CrushFTP, LLC

CrushFTP, LLC

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Indra

Indra

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CrushFTP, LLC in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

Indra has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CrushFTP, LLC (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CrushFTP, LLC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Indra (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Indra cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CrushFTP, LLC

CrushFTP, LLC

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CRU243073125
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
CRU709072025
Indra

Indra

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IND1782923647

FAQ

Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC company and Indra company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC and Indra, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC and Indra, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CrushFTP, LLC or Indra ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CrushFTP, LLC or Indra ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC and Indra, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CrushFTP, LLC and Indra, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA