Comparison Overview
Crown Castle

Crown Castle
1220 Augusta Drive, Suite 600, Houston, 77057, US
Last Update: 10/09/2026
Since 1994, Crown Castle has worked around the country to build and maintain the infrastructure behind the world’s most revolutionary technologies. This comprehensive portfolio of towers, small cells, and fiber gives people and communities access to essential data, tech...

AT&T
208 S. Akard Street, Dallas, 75202, US
Last Update: 10/09/2026
We understand that our customers want an easier, less complicated life. We’re using our network, labs, products, services, and people to create a world where everything works together seamlessly, and life is better as a result. How will we continue to drive for thi...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Crown Castle







AT&T






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Crown Castle in 2026.
Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)
AT&T has 967.96% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Crown Castle (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Crown Castle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - AT&T (X = Date, Y = Severity)
AT&T cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Crown Castle

AT&T
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
DocsGPT through 0.20.0 posts OAuth connector session tokens to a wildcard target origin in the callback-status endpoint without validating sender origin. Attackers can obtain session tokens and provider account emails by acting as window.opener during OAuth authorization, then use tokens to disconnect victims' cloud storage connectors.
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/docsgpt/api/connector/routes.py#L344-L366
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/docsgpt/api/connector/routes.py#L515-L527
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/blob/c36b0af17037449f34449efa97da82becfc9492d/frontend/src/components/ConnectorAuth.tsx#L57-L80
- https://github.com/arc53/DocsGPT/issues/2766
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/docsgpt-through-0.20.0-oauth-token-disclosure-via-wildcard-postmessage
DevSpace through 6.3.21 fails to reject parent-directory segments in tar entry names from the in-pod sync stream. Attackers operating a malicious container can stream tar entries with traversal sequences to write arbitrary files on the developer workstation, enabling code execution.
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/blob/7f272dcf90653fa9b42bc4347f7f3f9a52b0e8b5/pkg/devspace/sync/tar.go#L68-L82
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/blob/7f272dcf90653fa9b42bc4347f7f3f9a52b0e8b5/pkg/devspace/sync/util.go#L9-L11
- https://github.com/devspace-sh/devspace/issues/3290
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/devspace-through-6.3.21-path-traversal-via-tar-extraction
Refly through 1.1.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /v1/misc/scrape endpoint that fetches caller-supplied URLs without validating the scheme, host, or resolved address. Authenticated attackers can make the backend issue requests to loopback, private, and link-local addresses including cloud metadata services to read page titles and descriptions of internal resources.
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/blob/77fb0ca184251bba7380cbac2dbdf7a6c9944652/apps/api/src/modules/misc/misc.controller.ts#L38-L43
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/blob/77fb0ca184251bba7380cbac2dbdf7a6c9944652/packages/utils/src/scrape-weblink.ts
- https://github.com/refly-ai/refly/issues/2280
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/refly-through-1.1.0-server-side-request-forgery-via-scrape-endpoint
GrowthBook through 5.0.1 returns unredacted fact table definitions including raw warehouse SQL in payloads served by unauthenticated public report and experiment endpoints. Attackers with knowledge of a publicly shared report or experiment identifier can read internal data warehouse query text, schema, table names, filter values and datasource identifiers.
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/blob/57d07471b137eb43d9bfb1613d0a1203d21fef88/packages/back-end/src/app.ts#L391-L409
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/blob/57d07471b137eb43d9bfb1613d0a1203d21fef88/packages/back-end/src/services/reports.ts#L880-L890
- https://github.com/growthbook/growthbook/issues/6541
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/growthbook-through-5.0.1-information-disclosure-via-public-endpoints
Flowable flowable-engine through 8.0.0 contains an XML external entity injection vulnerability in ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.parseXml() that fails to disable external entity resolution when parsing deployed BPMN resources. Attackers with process deployment privileges can embed DOCTYPE declarations with external entities in BPMN files to read arbitrary local files or trigger requests to internal network endpoints when diagram layout is computed.
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/blob/0779d68e5a3385b74d8acb8bc37901ff54513249/modules/flowable-engine/src/main/java/org/flowable/engine/impl/bpmn/diagram/ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.java#L101-L118
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/blob/0779d68e5a3385b74d8acb8bc37901ff54513249/modules/flowable5-engine/src/main/java/org/activiti/engine/impl/bpmn/diagram/ProcessDiagramLayoutFactory.java#L97-L114
- https://github.com/flowable/flowable-engine/issues/4216
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/flowable-flowable-engine-through-8.0.0-xxe-via-processdiagramlayoutfactory