Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Crombie LockwoodCrombie Lockwood
VS
Munich ReMunich Re
Crombie Lockwood

Crombie Lockwood

Level 23, 191 Queen Street, Auckland, Auckland, NZ, 1010

Last Update: 22/11/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
www.ajg.co.nz
752/1000Fair

We’ve changed our name to Gallagher (formerly Crombie Lockwood). Please follow our new LinkedIn page, Gallagher Insurance New Zealand, as this page will no longer be active.

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:257
Subsidiaries:22
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Munich Re

Munich Re

Königinstrasse 107, Munich, 80802, DE

Last Update: 12/08/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.munichre.com
808/1000Good

Munich Re is one of the world’s leading providers of reinsurance, primary insurance and insurance-related risk solutions. The group consists of the reinsurance and ERGO business segments, as well as the capital investment company MEAG. We are globally active and operate...

NAICS:524
NAICS Definition:Insurance Carriers and Related Activities
Employees:15,187
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Crombie Lockwood

Crombie Lockwood

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Munich Re

Munich Re

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Crombie Lockwood in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)

Munich Re has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Crombie Lockwood (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Crombie Lockwood cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Munich Re (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Munich Re cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Crombie Lockwood

Crombie Lockwood

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Munich Re

Munich Re

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
MUN1786568796

FAQ

Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Crombie Lockwood company and Munich Re company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Crombie Lockwood and Munich Re, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Crombie Lockwood and Munich Re, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Crombie Lockwood or Munich Re ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Crombie Lockwood or Munich Re ?
Between Crombie Lockwood and Munich Re, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Crombie Lockwood and Munich Re, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9693
SUMMARY

Mattermost versions 10.11.x <= 10.11.20, 11.7.x <= 11.7.5 Mattermost fails to remove thread membership records when a user is removed from or leaves a team, which allows a previously removed user who is later re-invited to the team to view private channel thread root post content and metadata via the team threads API.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00682

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75587
SUMMARY

Mattermost Desktop App versions <=6.2 6.2.2.0 fail to redact the pre-auth secret when generating a diagnostics report, which allows a local attacker with access to a user's diagnostics report or log files to obtain the plaintext pre-auth secret configured for a connected server via inspecting the Server Connectivity (Step-3) diagnostics output. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00716

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-75078
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in SourceCodester Class and Exam Timetabling System 1.0. This affects an unknown part of the file /BSHRM1.php. Performing a manipulation of the argument course results in cross site scripting. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit has been released to the public and may be used for attacks.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 5.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67961
SUMMARY

An issue in O2OA v.10.0.2 allows a local attacker to execute arbitrary code via the the sandbox mechanism of the Invoke script execution.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-67919
SUMMARY

An issue in Halo 2.25.4 allows a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code via the PluginEndpoint.java, installFromUri method, and DefaultPluginApplicationContextFactory components

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-17
UPDATED
Date2026-08-17
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
REFERENCES