Comparison Overview
Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Cookeville Regional Medical Center
1 Medical Center Blvd, Cookeville, 38501, US
Last Update: 17/04/2026
At Cookeville Regional Medical Center, we are dedicated to providing the highest quality care to our patients and making a positive impact on our community. With a rich history dating back to 1921, our state-of-the-art medical center has grown into a leading facility wi...

Trinity Health
20555 Victor Parkway, Livonia, MI, US, 48152
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Trinity Health is one of the largest not-for-profit, Catholic health care systems in the nation. It is a family of 123,000 colleagues and nearly 27,000 physicians and clinicians caring for diverse communities across 26 states. Nationally recognized for care and experien...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cookeville Regional Medical Center







Trinity Health






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Cookeville Regional Medical Center has 29.08% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Trinity Health has 1.96% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incident History - Cookeville Regional Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cookeville Regional Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Trinity Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Trinity Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Trinity Health
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Omni C20 lacks proper certificate validation which could allow an attacker to perform a man-in-the-middle attack which could allow them to execute arbitrary code.
Omni C20 uses hard-coded credentials that could allow an attacker to monitor log files to obtain credentials to access information like mapping data.
The affected products are vulnerable to command injection attack that could allow an unauthenticated attacker to execute system commands during the pairing process.
The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware contains an authentication vulnerability in the root account exposed through the device's UART interface. The affected account does not require a password before granting access to a privileged system interface, and the interface also displays the device's WiFi password during startup. An unauthenticated attacker with physical access to the device could connect to the UART interface, obtain root privileges, and recover the WiFi password.
The Botslab G980H dash camera firmware generates the default WiFi password using predictable device information, portions of which are advertised by the product. An unauthenticated attacker within WiFi range could potentially determine the remaining password characters through limited guessing and gain unauthorized access to the device network.