Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cookeville Regional Medical CenterCookeville Regional Medical Center
VS
NSW HealthNSW Health
Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Cookeville Regional Medical Center

1 Medical Center Blvd, Cookeville, 38501, US

Last Update: 17/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.crmchealth.org
267/1000Critical

At Cookeville Regional Medical Center, we are dedicated to providing the highest quality care to our patients and making a positive impact on our community. With a rich history dating back to 1921, our state-of-the-art medical center has grown into a leading facility wi...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:2,416
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
NSW Health

NSW Health

1 Reserve Road, St. Leonards, 2065, AU

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.health.nsw.gov.au
761/1000Fair

​​​​​​​With more than 170,000 staff and 228 hospitals, there are millions of ways we are enriching the health of the NSW community every day. In front of a patient, working in a kitchen, developing new treatments, or at a desk, each one of our staff is a vital member o...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:22,758
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Cookeville Regional Medical Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NSW Health

NSW Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Cookeville Regional Medical Center has 27.54% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NSW Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cookeville Regional Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cookeville Regional Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NSW Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NSW Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PEAFLOCRM1776443473
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CRM1202412092025
🔒 Incident : Breach
CRM1776292293
NSW Health

NSW Health

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
NSW2364123091025
🔒 Incident : Data Leak
NSW13381122

FAQ

Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NSW Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center and NSW Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center and NSW Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cookeville Regional Medical Center or NSW Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cookeville Regional Medical Center or NSW Health ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center and NSW Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center and NSW Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-9044
SUMMARY

An OS command injection vulnerability exists in the VPN module of TP-Link AXE75 V1 routers. This vulnerability allows an adjacent, authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary commands on the device by importing a specially crafted VPN client configuration file. The issue arises from improper filtering of special characters.  Successful exploitation of this vulnerability may enable an attacker to gain full control of the affected device, potentially compromising configuration integrity, network security, and service availability.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:A/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:L/SI:L/SA:L/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-54909
SUMMARY

pion/stun is a Go implementation of STUN. Prior to 3.1.3, XORMappedAddress.GetFromAs can panic while parsing a malformed short XOR-MAPPED-ADDRESS attribute in STUN or ICE Binding-response parsing paths, allowing remote denial of service. This issue is fixed in version 3.1.3.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54785
SUMMARY

gemini-bridge is a lightweight MCP server bridging AI agents to Google's Gemini AI via the official CLI. From 1.0.0 until 1.3.1, consult_gemini_with_files in inline mode read any file path supplied in the files argument without confining it to the working directory, then forwarded the contents to the Gemini CLI. Because the caller also controls query, the file contents are echoed back through the Gemini round-trip (and sent to Google), making this an arbitrary local file read. This issue is fixed in version 1.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.5
CVE-2026-54768
SUMMARY

WPGraphQL provides a GraphQL API for WordPress sites. From 2.0.0 until 2.15.1, the deprecated user field on SendPasswordResetEmailPayload lets an unauthenticated caller distinguish existing author-class accounts through the sendPasswordResetEmail mutation and obtain public profile fields. This issue is fixed in version 2.15.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-53573
SUMMARY

GeoNetwork is a catalog application to manage spatially referenced resources. From 3.12.0 until 4.2.16 and 4.4.11, unsafe redirect validation in GeonetworkOAuth2LoginAuthenticationFilter and KeycloakAuthenticationProcessingFilter permits an attacker-controlled external redirect after login. This issue is fixed in versions 4.2.16 and 4.4.11.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-31
UPDATED
Date2026-07-31
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 4.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA