Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cookeville Regional Medical CenterCookeville Regional Medical Center
VS
NHG HealthNHG Health
Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Cookeville Regional Medical Center

1 Medical Center Blvd, Cookeville, 38501, US

Last Update: 17/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.crmchealth.org
267/1000Critical

At Cookeville Regional Medical Center, we are dedicated to providing the highest quality care to our patients and making a positive impact on our community. With a rich history dating back to 1921, our state-of-the-art medical center has grown into a leading facility wi...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:2,416
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2
NHG Health

NHG Health

3 Fusionopolis Link, #03-08, Nexus@one-north (South Lobby), Singapore, SG, 138543

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.nhghealth.com.sg
779/1000Fair

NHG Health is a leading public healthcare provider in Singapore recognised for its quality clinical care and its commitment in enabling healthier lives through preventive health, innovative solutions and person-centred programmes tailored to every life stage. Our integr...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:13,776
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Cookeville Regional Medical Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
NHG Health

NHG Health

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Cookeville Regional Medical Center has 28.57% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for NHG Health in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cookeville Regional Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cookeville Regional Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - NHG Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)

NHG Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Cookeville Regional Medical Center

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
PEAFLOCRM1776443473
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CRM1202412092025
🔒 Incident : Breach
CRM1776292293
NHG Health

NHG Health

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center company and NHG Health company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center and NHG Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center and NHG Health, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cookeville Regional Medical Center or NHG Health ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cookeville Regional Medical Center or NHG Health ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center and NHG Health, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cookeville Regional Medical Center and NHG Health, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8