Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal DivisionU.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division
VS
Swedish Police AuthoritySwedish Police Authority
U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

N/A

Last Update: 27/03/2026

View Profile
737/1000Moderate

The Criminal Division develops, enforces, and supervises the application of all federal criminal laws except those specifically assigned to other divisions. The Division, and the 94 U.S. Attorneys have the responsibility for overseeing criminal matters under the more th...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:705
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Swedish Police Authority

Swedish Police Authority

Polhemsgatan , Stockholm, 10226, SE

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://polisen.se/
785/1000Fair

Vi gör hela Sverige tryggt och säkert! Att arbeta inom polisen är ett av de finaste uppdrag man kan ha. Du bidrar till samhället genom att göra hela Sverige tryggt och säkert. Oavsett om du jobbar i en civil roll eller som polis, är möjligheterna att växa med en större...

NAICS:92212
NAICS Definition:Police Protection
Employees:10,579
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Swedish Police Authority

Swedish Police Authority

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division has 38.65% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Law Enforcement Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Swedish Police Authority in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division (X = Date, Y = Severity)

U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Swedish Police Authority (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Swedish Police Authority cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CRISTR1774636436
Swedish Police Authority

Swedish Police Authority

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division company and Swedish Police Authority company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division and Swedish Police Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division and Swedish Police Authority, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division or Swedish Police Authority ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division or Swedish Police Authority ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division and Swedish Police Authority, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between U.S. Department of Justice, Criminal Division and Swedish Police Authority, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-81203
SUMMARY

A vulnerability has been found in SourceCodester Simple Online Food Ordering System 1.0. This affects an unknown function of the file /admin/ajax.php?action=login2. The manipulation of the argument email leads to sql injection. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-80158
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in the ipa_getkeytab module of the community.general Ansible collection. The module's bind_pw parameter, used to supply the LDAP simple-bind password when retrieving a Kerberos keytab, is not declared with no_log, unlike the sibling password parameter in the same module. As a consequence, the supplied IPA/LDAP bind password is recorded in cleartext in the managed host's system journal/syslog (the module's "Invoked with" record), is included in the module's return values and verbose (-v) output, and is displayed in Automation Controller / AWX job output. The password is additionally passed on the command line to the ipa-getkeytab helper (as --bindpw <value>), exposing it in the process list to local users while the command runs. An attacker able to read these logs, job output, or the process table can obtain the directory bind credential, potentially compromising the accounts and objects that credential can access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-75340
SUMMARY

The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75338
SUMMARY

disconf (Distributed Configuration Management Platform) 2.6.36 is vulnerable to Incorrect Access Control. The config-fetching APIs /api/config/item, /api/config/file, /api/config/list and /api/config/simple/list are exposed without authentication. The LoginInterceptor explicitly whitelists these four paths, so any anonymous attacker can read every configuration item and configuration file managed by the config center.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-75336
SUMMARY

Funiture 1.0.0 is vulnerable to SQL Injection in the backend tool interfaces /sys/tool/select.json and /sys/tool/update.json.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-26
UPDATED
Date2026-08-26
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA