Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CFNA (Credit First National Association)CFNA (Credit First National Association)
VS
BNYBNY
CFNA (Credit First National Association)

CFNA (Credit First National Association)

6275 Eastland Rd., Brook Park, 44142, US

Last Update: 11/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cfna.com/
755/1000Fair

CFNA is a private label credit card bank and the consumer credit division of Bridgestone Americas. At our office in Brook Park, OH, a suburb 15 miles outside of downtown Cleveland, over 300 professionals gather each day to run a successful private label credit card prog...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:213
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
BNY

BNY

240 Greenwich St, New York, NY, US, 10286

Last Update: 21/05/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.bny.com
760/1000Fair

BNY is a global financial services platforms company at the heart of the world’s capital markets. For more than 240 years BNY has partnered alongside clients, using its expertise and platforms to help them operate more efficiently and accelerate growth. Today BNY serve...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:54,093
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CFNA (Credit First National Association)

CFNA (Credit First National Association)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
BNY

BNY

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CFNA (Credit First National Association) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

BNY has 5.66% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CFNA (Credit First National Association) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CFNA (Credit First National Association) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - BNY (X = Date, Y = Severity)

BNY cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CFNA (Credit First National Association)

CFNA (Credit First National Association)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
BNY

BNY

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
BNY1776199205

FAQ

Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) company and BNY company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) and BNY, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) and BNY, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CFNA (Credit First National Association) or BNY ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CFNA (Credit First National Association) or BNY ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) and BNY, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CFNA (Credit First National Association) and BNY, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2