Comparison Overview
CREDIT DU MAROC

CREDIT DU MAROC
Casablanca, MA
Last Update: 07/11/2025
Crédit du Maroc, filiale du groupe Holmarcom, est une banque universelle et généraliste qui s’adresse à tous les segments de clients. Véritable acteur économique et financier et partenaire durable de l’économie marocaine, la banque est ancrée dans l’histoire du Royaume ...

DenizBank
Büyükdere Caddesi 141, Esentepe, 34394, TR
Last Update: 02/04/2026
In 1997, DenizBank was acquired by the Zorlu Holding in the form of a banking license from the Privatization Administration. Undergoing three shareholder changes and done public offering in its short history, the Bank was acquired in October 2006 by Dexia, one of the le...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CREDIT DU MAROC







DenizBank






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for CREDIT DU MAROC in 2026.
Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for DenizBank in 2026.
Incident History - CREDIT DU MAROC (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CREDIT DU MAROC cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - DenizBank (X = Date, Y = Severity)
DenizBank cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CREDIT DU MAROC

DenizBank
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.
Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.
Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.
Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.
Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.